I personally detest that spotting on the good St. George....
Frankly, I'm puzzled as to how that ever got in a 64 holder???? Mr. Hall, oh Mr. Hall!!
Also, I'd bet those specks are surrounding tiny pits in the metal's surface. They're AS. Lloyd, are those teeny-tiny pits common to these proof crowns? Just wondering.
Are those hairlines I see on the obverse? I am going to walk over here and stand with the people who say pass or at least don't buy it until you have seen it in hand.
If you are in the Western North Carolina area, please consider visiting our coin shop:
Well a colourful tone, that killed it for me, being spotted really killed it. (like most coins with bright colours it reminds me of those oil spots you see on the road...) *shudder*
And yes they look like hairlines, sorry i don't like it.
I imagine the coin is much nicer in hand. I bought a 1908 shilling from them where the picture was terrible but the coin itself was very nice. It's one of my favorites.
The 27 proofs all tone a dark carbon grey colour. Horrible.
The 1911 sets tone grayish as well, I've noticed - but it seems a nicer toning.
<< <i> I imagine the coin is much nicer in hand. I bought a 1908 shilling from them ...... >>
Without a doubt.
I just revisited some old images of a proof 1911 sixpence which I tried to capture before the Ott lights or the angled glass technique (henceforth AGT), and if you saw them your take would be, "Bleeeech!!". The wild, electric blues and greens tend to look more akin to the colour of brownish flood waters currently overtaking much of the Midwest.
Also, the digicams often tend to accentuate the "ghastlies" in the image. It's almost like it places a floodlight on a teeny, tiny defect which to the eye and even a 10x loupe is not a distraction, and says, "Ladies and gentlemen may I direct your attention to the Grand Canyon!"
That said, I would think there is more pleasing '93 crown out there for that money. That is, all PF64s are not created equal.
Comments
DPOTD-3
'Emancipate yourselves from mental slavery'
CU #3245 B.N.A. #428
Don
Frankly, I'm puzzled as to how that ever got in a 64 holder???? Mr. Hall, oh Mr. Hall!!
Also, I'd bet those specks are surrounding tiny pits in the metal's surface. They're AS. Lloyd, are those teeny-tiny pits common to these proof crowns? Just wondering.
09/07/2006
<< <i>ASk them to send it on memo. If you like it, pay them, if not send it back. >>
It's offered on eBay, so I don't think they'll that. If it isn't sold by auction I may just ask Chris to send it to take a look.
DPOTD-3
'Emancipate yourselves from mental slavery'
CU #3245 B.N.A. #428
Don
WNC Coins, LLC
1987-C Hendersonville Road
Asheville, NC 28803
wnccoins.com
And yes they look like hairlines, sorry i don't like it.
The 27 proofs all tone a dark carbon grey colour. Horrible.
The 1911 sets tone grayish as well, I've noticed - but it seems a nicer toning.
<< <i> I imagine the coin is much nicer in hand. I bought a 1908 shilling from them ...... >>
Without a doubt.
I just revisited some old images of a proof 1911 sixpence which I tried to capture before the Ott lights or the angled glass technique (henceforth AGT), and if you saw them your take would be, "Bleeeech!!". The wild, electric blues and greens tend to look more akin to the colour of brownish flood waters currently overtaking much of the Midwest.
Also, the digicams often tend to accentuate the "ghastlies" in the image. It's almost like it places a floodlight on a teeny, tiny defect which to the eye and even a 10x loupe is not a distraction, and says, "Ladies and gentlemen may I direct your attention to the Grand Canyon!"
That said, I would think there is more pleasing '93 crown out there for that money. That is, all PF64s are not created equal.
DPOTD-3
'Emancipate yourselves from mental slavery'
CU #3245 B.N.A. #428
Don
I used to have a BU 1887 shilling, but it looked a little more like this...
And that was the scarce variant too! I didn't find that out until the day before i sold it, i had it all these years too!