Home› PCGS Set Registry Forum

So is David Hall now just screwing with the Lincoln Short set people

sonofagunksonofagunk Posts: 1,349 ✭✭
in PCGS Set Registry Forum
someone who just doesn't care

David is this another stall tactic? Just come out and say it. There is no benefit to PCGS to add the Lincoln short set at the moment, so you just are not going to do it. If this is not the case, can you list the order that ALL short sets are coming out?

You have been asked a ton of questions about the 34-58 short set, is your memory short as short set?
eBay Error Sales

Comments

  • Dennis88Dennis88 Posts: 5,797 ✭✭✭
    ........................(waiting)..............................

    Dennis
    VOC Numismatics
    Like VOC Numismatics on facebook
  • BearBear Posts: 18,953 ✭✭✭
    Relax, all good things in good time.
    There once was a place called
    Camelotimage
  • STEWARTBLAYNUMISSTEWARTBLAYNUMIS Posts: 2,697 ✭✭✭✭

    SOG - Isn't there enough insanity with Lincoln Cents without adding ANOTHER set ? I for one presently do not want to see another Lincoln cent set added at the present time.

    Stewart
  • RussRuss Posts: 48,514 ✭✭✭


    << <i>I for one presently do not want to see another Lincoln cent set added at the present time. >>



    Translation:

    "I got mine, screw you lesser beings."

    Russ, NCNE
    eBay consignment sales | | Collectibles from Resco CCC
  • STEWARTBLAYNUMISSTEWARTBLAYNUMIS Posts: 2,697 ✭✭✭✭
    Real Translation

    Russ has his Kennedy short set and now that he's experienced in short sets he's going to collect a short set of Lincolns.

    Russ - Do you hear me talking about accented hair ? Please don't talk about Lincolns


    stewart
  • RussRuss Posts: 48,514 ✭✭✭


    << <i>Real Translation

    Russ has his Kennedy short set and now that he's experienced in short sets he's going to collect a short set of Lincolns. >>



    Yeah, that's it Stewie, I'm going to start collecting Lincolns. image

    Russ, NCNE
    eBay consignment sales | | Collectibles from Resco CCC
  • RegistryCoinRegistryCoin Posts: 5,117 ✭✭✭✭
    Been there done that... You may find a date or two to better Stewart's, and make a buck or two off him, but never will better his whole collection. It is incomparable, imho. image
  • sonofagunksonofagunk Posts: 1,349 ✭✭
    it doesn't matter who wants it and who doesn't. Just the BS of him stalling the 6th person to ask about it with the question "which wheat short set". Just a lack of repect for people who he is making a ton of money from.
    eBay Error Sales
  • RegistryCoinRegistryCoin Posts: 5,117 ✭✭✭✭
    As my daddy always told me "it's just paper-profit until you sell." image
  • RussRuss Posts: 48,514 ✭✭✭


    << <i>who he is making a ton of money from. >>



    That should be "from whom he is making a ton of money". image

    Russ, NCNE
    eBay consignment sales | | Collectibles from Resco CCC
  • BearBear Posts: 18,953 ✭✭✭
    Lets all remember that "Rome wasnt built in a day".
    There once was a place called
    Camelotimage
  • prooflikeprooflike Posts: 3,879 ✭✭
    DH did ask which short set and gave some date spans...

    do a poll, see what people want and reference it to the guy so you can get what you want.
    image
  • jacktheknifejacktheknife Posts: 1,547 ✭


    I think HRH is being facetious. Most Lincoln cent collectors will agree that there has always been a soft division of the set at 1934. Prior to the Registry craze, most sets consisted of 1909-1934. HRH knows that a short set would be 34-58 as he mentions it in his response to Dennis88 in the Q&A question. If he didn't know 34-58 would be the short set, I really doubt that he would have come up with those dates just by chance. Again, I think he knows what the short set would be. For whatever reason, at this time he seems to be skirting the issue.
    I happen to agree with Stewart, and don't see the benefit of a "half a set" registry.
Sign In or Register to comment.