I need you expertise on this Barber..
aussielover
Posts: 177
Could I get some grading opinion on this 1902-O Barber half please..
Thanks
A..L..
Just to make clearification on the pics, there is no rim ding or damage. The rim is perfectly round and problem free. The coin is in the plastic holder and it seems to be bent a little on the top right and bottom left of the obverse.
Thanks
A..L..
Just to make clearification on the pics, there is no rim ding or damage. The rim is perfectly round and problem free. The coin is in the plastic holder and it seems to be bent a little on the top right and bottom left of the obverse.
0
Comments
Camelot
Tyler
for the coin, say 2 dollars?
Camelot
<< <i>Nice coin Brian. I am going to have to say AG3, maybe on a good day a G4! >>
Gee thanks..
Brian
Camelot
Some sport you are Tyler!
You just wait and see.. in 10+ years my set will.. gosh that's such a long time..
<< <i>If that isn't rim damage on the obverse at 7 O'clock then it looks to be a solid XF though low end. XF/XF- >>
Edited the original post. No there aren't any dings nor damages on the coin itself, just the holder.
Brian
LSCC#1864
Ebay Stuff
it would be hard not to call it XF40 at the minimum
nice coin!
K S
42/92
I hate it when you see my post before I can edit the spelling.
Always looking for nice type coins
my local dealer
Nice 1902-O XF 40 you've got there , congrats. The obverse is really a 45, but as you know the reverse of this date is always softer, and that's why the other members are saying the coin is only a VF. Its a STRONG 40, and again if the reverse were just a tough better struck, it'd be a choice 45.
Its also one of the toughest dates to find in a higher grade XF or AU. I'm still looking ...
~~~~~~~~~~~~
Coin collecting is not a hobby, it's an obsession !
New Barber Purchases
K S
Dave
I like the looks of this 1902-O better than my MS62! Very nice!
I touched up the lighting just a bit. I realy don't see many marks at all and think this may even go AU50?
Larry
Dabigkahuna
EF-40
(and possibly on a good day AU-50?)
My posts viewed times
since 8/1/6
For my inexperienced eyes, when I first saw the coin I thought it was AU because of the luster.
And then I thought this was cleaned because I know majority of all shiny coins are cleaned. But the local shop dealer/grader assured me that the coin was natural with LUSTER.
And Mike, you're right on the money.. at least now I know why the coin was set for XF40. The obverse is definitely XF45 but because of more wear on reverse it makes XF40. Overall I think it's a nice coin too.
Brian
Brian,
ALWAYS remember that the O mint had weaker strikes in 1902 on the reverse than normally found .
Quote: From David Lawrence's "The Complete Guide to Barber Halves", page 59.
........" SCARCITY: Despite its high mintage, scarce in F and above, especially well struck.
Rarity Rating: G-VG R2, F-VF R3, XF-AU R3, MS R4.
.....
......." COMMENTS: Consistently one of the poorest struck coins in the series. Well struck coins are worth a premium and very few, if any exist in MS. Luster seems to be below average as a rule. "
Take my word for it, its a solid XF 40. On a good day accross the street it "may" go to a XF45. Alot of XF's have some luster around the rim & stars. I JUST READ THE LAWRENCE GRADING GUIDE WITH PICTURES, YOU VERY WELL MAY BE RIGHT, ITS ALOT CLOSER TO A 45 THAN I THOUGHT.
I guess I'm still from the ancient school of Barber graders... been at it for 37 years...
~~~~~~~~~~~~
Coin collecting is not a hobby, it's an obsession !
New Barber Purchases
I hate it when you see my post before I can edit the spelling.
Always looking for nice type coins
my local dealer