Very happy with recent submission results...
Jamericon
Posts: 438 ✭✭✭
This was in a 63 holder...
1 21464936 1892 S$1 USA MS64
Date Received: 01/15/2004
Date Shipped: 01/27/2004
Just picked this up today from the local PO. I should just about double my money on this one.
1 21464936 1892 S$1 USA MS64
Date Received: 01/15/2004
Date Shipped: 01/27/2004
Just picked this up today from the local PO. I should just about double my money on this one.
Jamie Yakes - U.S. paper money collector, researcher, and author. | Join the SPMCUS Small-Size Notes, National Bank Notes, and NJ Depression Scrip
0
Comments
<< <i>This was in a 63 holder... >>
Whose holder?
Russ, NCNE
seems like when I post results like this I get blamed for having maxed out coins in my slabs. I guess there is a double standard for dealers and collectors.
I am not trying to rag on you Jamercon, just trying to make a point.
al h.
The purpose of grading a coin is to have it correctly graded. If a coin comes back the same grade 10x, yes it is maxed out, but then is it not correctly graded?
Everyone else reading this?
<< <i>very good point. I'm with you on that one.
Everyone else reading this?
>>
No. I stopped at the first whine.
peacockcoins
<< <i>I guess there is a double standard for dealers and collectors. >>
That is as it should be. Collectors good, dealers evil. You new?
Russ, NCNE
<< <i>I don't care if a coin is maxed out in a holder but OTHER people do. >>
Jason, don't let those "OTHER" people bother you. THEY are the real immature, jealous whiners.
I know you as a high quality dealer. As a collector, I expect you to do the due diligence and max out a coin for me. I like knowing that coin is all there in representation to the grade. It eliminates doubt.
Sometimes, it is fun to be challenged and try to stalk out the coins that are possible upgrades. Then there are times, when I want a good solid coin for the money without breaking out a loop and tearing the coin down looking for flaws.
2. Think the guy you will sell it to will be happy?
3. Why wasn't it in the "correct" holder to begin with?
food for thought.
rainbowroosie April 1, 2003
<< <i>1. Think the guy you bought it from is happy? >>
Why not? He got paid. Besides, if he couldn't recognize an undergraded coin that's his fault, not Jamericon's.
<< <i>2. Think the guy you will sell it to will be happy? >>
Why wouldn't he be? The coin is what it is. Why would he do a deal on a coin with which he would not be happy?
<< <i>3. Why wasn't it in the "correct" holder to begin with? >>
See last sentence of #1.
Russ, NCNE
#1. What Russ said. Besides, this guy was a local dealer who who made $15 on this coin when I bought it. I get the impression that he does not play the crackout game. He deals more in moderns anyway.
#2. Aside from that fact that the coin is what it is, they would never know.
#3. It was. But just a grade lower.