Home PSA Set Registry Forum

Dmitri Young converts to GAI???!!!

Hot story of the day is baseball star Dmitri Young has converted his high-end vintage sportscard collection to GAI from PSA.

Dmitri has one of the most impressive vintage psa 10 collections in the hobby.

I am not posting this as a knock against PSA but perhaps those owners of pop 2 psa 10s now own a pop 1 psa 10.

Dav
«1

Comments

  • kobykoby Posts: 1,699 ✭✭
    Hopefully, he can post his cross-over results on the forums.

    A GAI 9.5 is a Gem Mint card that is supposely the equivalent to a PSA 10. GAI 10 cards are "PERFECT" cards.

    If all of Dimitri Young's PSA 10s converted to GAI 10, does that mean PSA has tougher standards?




  • Just got the results back from a GAI 9.5 1969 Marshall. It came back trimmed from PSA and I was the one who broke it out of the case. Also had a BVG 8.5 leaders #2 1969 come back trimmed.

    Dave
    Visit my site @ www.djjscards.com
  • DavalilloDavalillo Posts: 1,846 ✭✭
    Dave,

    Thats interesting.

    Presumably the reason that Charlie crossed over a set to GAI and had a number of other sets graded by them and Dmitri did what he did is confidence in Mike Baker.

  • Dave,

    Do they looked trimmed or undersized. I had the same card come back twice as undersized and twice trimmed and I'm 100% sure it wasnt trimmed.

    As for dimitri dont know what to say on that but I'm sure probably did it for the holder if this it true at all. Bummer being is once again the pop report is scewed.

    Gator
  • DavalilloDavalillo Posts: 1,846 ✭✭
    Gator,

    I'm sure Dmitri could give a damn about the holder--he is close to Baker/Rocchi and I'm sure they convinced him to do it.

    Major dealer told me today that Dmitri takes some of his cards with himm when he travels on road trips.

    Dav
  • sixdartsixdart Posts: 821 ✭✭
    Anyone have a sample of the key cards in his collection?
  • Davallio,

    I'm not so sure I'd say he doesn't care about the holder not saying your wrong. He's pretty picky about his cards he doesn't mind upgrading even if it has the same grade.

  • Ditto on sixdart's comment. Anyone have an idea of what he owns? If I recall, he's the one who bought the PSA 10 54 Banks rookie a few years back?

    I know I've sold him an 87 Topps Palmeiro PSA 10 a couple of years ago.
  • mikeschmidtmikeschmidt Posts: 5,756 ✭✭✭
    Interesting....

    I have been approached (through a third party) to coordinate a trade with Dmitri. What particularly interests me is that the card I was offered is a PSA 10 card -- and the card that is desired is a different PSA 10 card. I was told that simply Dmitri had confined his collecting interests a little further -- and the card offered to me was outside of the confines of his new interests.

    The other interesting thing is that the third party is in fact a PSA supporter, and to my knowledge has never sold a GAI card.

    Also interesting is that I have a HOF GAI 9.5 vintage card that I am sure would fit in very nicely with Dmitri's interests. Something I had not considered before and may consider now.

    Cheers-
    MS
    I am actively buying MIKE SCHMIDT gem mint baseball cards. Also looking for any 19th century cabinets of Philadephia Nationals. Please PM with additional details.
  • mikeschmidtmikeschmidt Posts: 5,756 ✭✭✭


    << <i>Ditto on sixdart's comment. Anyone have an idea of what he owns? If I recall, he's the one who bought the PSA 10 54 Banks rookie a few years back?

    I know I've sold him an 87 Topps Palmeiro PSA 10 a couple of years ago. >>




    Without getting too specific, I would simply say that my knowledge of his collection (which is limited) suggests that he owns relatively few cards but those that he owns are freaking superstar knockout cards.
    I am actively buying MIKE SCHMIDT gem mint baseball cards. Also looking for any 19th century cabinets of Philadephia Nationals. Please PM with additional details.
  • DavalilloDavalillo Posts: 1,846 ✭✭
    Marc is right.I would think in terms of Mantle, Mays, Aaron, Clemente, Banks rookie cards in psa 10.
  • NickMNickM Posts: 4,895 ✭✭✭
    How long until he buys the Reggie Jackson rookie just graded in PSA 10?

    Based on past threads from people's dealings with him, he also has fairly high quantities of modern HOF or surefire HOF rookies in PSA 10, including Puckett and McGwire.

    Here are some of the pops on the key HOF rookies in PSA 10

    Joe DiMaggio - 0 in any of the 4 sets that could be regarded as his rookie ('36 World Wide Gum, '37 OPC, '38 Goudey, and '39 Play Ball)
    Ted Williams - 1 in '39 Play Ball
    Berra - 1 in '48 Bowman (interestingly, there is not another PSA 10 Berra until '56 Topps)
    Musial - 0 in '48 Leaf, 1 in '48 Bowman (that and a '63 Topps are the only 2 playing days PSA 10s of Musial)
    Campanella - 1 in '49 Bowman
    Snider - 0 in '49 Bowman
    Jackie Robinson - 0 in '48 Leaf, 0 in '49 Bowman
    Mantle - 1 in '51 Bowman, 3 in '52 Topps
    Mays - 0 in '51 Bowman, 1 in '52 Topps
    Aaron - 2 in '54 Topps (Tom Candiotti owns one)
    Banks - 1 in '54 Topps
    Kaline - 1 in '54 Topps
    Clemente - 1 in '55 Topps
    Koufax - 2 in '55 Topps
    Killebrew - 1 in '55 Topps
    Frank Robinson - 0 in '57 Topps
    Brooks Robinson - 1 in '57 Topps

    Nick
    image
    Reap the whirlwind.

    Need to buy something for the wife or girlfriend? Check out Vintage Designer Clothing.
  • GAI overgrades. I just crossed a GAI 1.5 to a PSA 1.....image
  • NickMNickM Posts: 4,895 ✭✭✭
    mrc - what is the overgrade? PSA 1 includes both Poor and Fair. GAI breaks it down so that Poor is 1.0 and Fair is 1.5, as do Beckett and SGC (although Beckett could conceivably give a card an 0.5). If I want to get a vintage card graded that is a classic Fair condition card, (think multiple creases, rounded corners, poor centering, but still reasonably clean), why would I want to put it in the same holder as would apply to a card that had been seriously abused and had much of the front surface lost?

    Nick
    image
    Reap the whirlwind.

    Need to buy something for the wife or girlfriend? Check out Vintage Designer Clothing.
  • i think he was joking
  • With the advent of crossovers that affects all grading companies...how can one company keep track and monitor an accurate population report. The population report(s) can only show the history of PSA 10s graded, not the current population.

    In all fairness to PSA, I do not see how they can monitor this or keep track. I've thought population reports were a waste of time. Call 'em historical reports and then maybe i'll think otherwise.
    Gold Coins
    Silver Coins

    e-bay ID: grilloj39
    e-mail: grilloj39@gmail.com
  • I have this wild dream that someday PSA will upgrade their holder, and offer a knock-out deal for reholdering. If this would ever come to pass, it might also provide an opportunity to get a handle on the true population of some of the higher-grade cards out there if they kept track of reholders and noted the numbers in the population report.

    As for Dmitri, I can say, based on the cards he has purchased from me, that his collection is definitely NOT ONLY a small collection of knock-out cards, but rather a pretty broad (and large) collection of higher-grade cards to go along with the knock-outs.

    BTW, he's a great person to deal with. The first time he bought cards from me and I realized who he was, I jokingly sent him a message telling him that I would have a hard time deciding if I was going to cash his check or keep it and give the auto to my daughter... he "responded" by including a handful of his own cards in with the check, all of which he signed. He even personalized one of them for her!

    -
    JR
  • CWCW Posts: 1,213 ✭✭✭
    I'm not sure which move is worse: Dmitri's choice to crossover to GAI,
    or his decision to play for the Tigers.

    image
  • BasiloneBasilone Posts: 2,492 ✭✭

    If this story is true...Im surprised GAI is not promoting it on their website

    BTW...I probably have the largest Dmitri Young raw collection on this board....image
  • VarghaVargha Posts: 2,392 ✭✭
    Dmitri Young converts to GAI???!!!

    I told you it was a choice. Some folks keep trying to tell me that people are born that way.
  • RobERobE Posts: 1,160 ✭✭
    1980 TOPPS 77 DAVID STEIB ROOKIE PSA 10 1/1

    I can't confirm this but earlier today it was suspected that a 3rd party buyer purchased this card for Mr.Young but nobody is really sure and I have not asked the buyers involved.

    The buyer's Paypal account was hacked into so Joe Tuttle paid for it.




  • murcerfanmurcerfan Posts: 2,329 ✭✭
    Dmitri Young converts to GAI???!!!

    Hopefully no free Hummers were involved........image
  • now dmitri can save some cash by buying GAI cards instead of PSA, this should offset his losses if he decides to cross his PSA 10's for GLOBAL 9.5's or 10's. maybe this explains why he chooses to play in detroit (sorry tiger fans). this shouldn't be seen as an attack on GAI but simply stated: PSA cards are worth more than GAI...at least for the time being. ever since BECKETT started that BCCG thing they do(which i don't understand) they have lost a great deal of credibility in my eyes, SGC always seemed liberal on grading vintage material, i see PSA and GLOBAL as the only viable grading entities out there, i like GLOBAL for authenticating the unopened items, beyond that PSA is still the leader and the proof is in the value their cards command.
  • murcerfanmurcerfan Posts: 2,329 ✭✭
    SGC always seemed liberal on grading vintage material

    Rubish.
  • NickMNickM Posts: 4,895 ✭✭✭
    murcerfan - would you agree that SGC gives more of an overall eye appeal grade on vintage cards than a technical standards grade?

    Nick
    image
    Reap the whirlwind.

    Need to buy something for the wife or girlfriend? Check out Vintage Designer Clothing.
  • wolfbearwolfbear Posts: 2,759 ✭✭✭

    Hopefully a wake up call to PSA,
    that high profile clients expect, are used to,
    and are entitled to special attention.

    Lucky for Dmitri, resale value is not an issue if one has unlimited funds.

    Of course, the cards, with their known provenance,
    could easily be crossed back over ...

    Pix of 'My Kids'

    "How about a little fire Scarecrow ?"
  • theBobstheBobs Posts: 1,136 ✭✭
    Hopefully he gets better service than this...
    Where have you gone Dave Vargha
    CU turns its lonely eyes to you
    What's the you say, Mrs Robinson
    Vargha bucks have left and gone away?

    hey hey hey
    hey hey hey
  • "SGC always seemed liberal on grading vintage material"

    My experiences with SGC vintange is limited to over 500 cards from 1959 and 100 or so from 1963. Generally speaking, but consistent to a fault, SGC is:

    1/2 to 1 grade tougher on corner wear,
    1/2 to 1 grade more lenient on centering,
    slightly tougher on minor print defects, but more lenient than PSA on major print defects (e.g., SGC will penalize on dark print ink spots, but ignore "snow" where PSA gives the dreaded PD qualifier).

    Overall, SGC gives the benefit of the doubt, if you will, to a card with great eye appeal say from surface gloss, if centering is askew. I'm not a centering freak and I can delineate between 65/35 vs. 70/30, when PSA seemingly has trouble with this. I've got a lot of cards in PSA 7 holders that are 8's with 65/35 centering. That's the standard BTW, but it's almost as if PSA doesn't go to the trouble of measuring the centering.

    Disclaimer: Opinion and fact are interspersed in the above comments. Take your best shot.

  • NickM- Of course I was joking. I think GAI grades fine! I crossed over my 1.5 to a 1 for my set. I don't really mind the lower graded cards.

    Cheers
  • aconteaconte Posts: 2,053 ✭✭✭


    << <i>Hopefully he gets better service >>



    thebobs,

    If he is close to Baker + Rocchi as Davalillo states, then my guess is he will. If you check out
    the second post on this thread here, you will see some sweet
    service. And I don't think this guy was that close with Rocchi.

    aconte
  • murcerfanmurcerfan Posts: 2,329 ✭✭
    murcerfan - would you agree that SGC gives more of an overall eye appeal grade on vintage cards than a technical standards grade?

    No, not at all.

    In fact I only hear PSA using terms like "subjective eye-appeal" in defending overgraded cards.
    somehow cards sent in from Irvine CA and Traverse City MI seem to be dripping with this stuff.
  • 1420sports1420sports Posts: 3,473 ✭✭✭
    In fact I only hear PSA using terms like "subjective eye-appeal" in defending overgraded cards.
    somehow cards sent in from Irvine CA and Traverse City MI seem to be dripping with this stuff.


    I thought that PSA has no idea whose cards they are grading? image
    collecting various PSA and SGC cards
  • when i stated that "sgc always seemed liberal on grading vintage material" i based it on my experiances. i will list cards from a fairly recent submission to psa that were former residents of SGC 86 & 88 holders , i cracked them and sent them raw to psa.

    60 snider 30559992 sgc 86 to psa 7
    71 rose 30559994 sgc 88 to psa 7
    71 mays 30560002 sgc 88 to psa 7
    71 clemente 30560003 sgc 88 to psa 7

    granted, i picked up the SGC 's over time, i had the snider and rose for at least a couple of years. the clemente and rose look like absolute beasts . however , the clemente has slight "chipping" on the top edge, the rose has a "touch" to the lower right corner, but has a slight "diamond cut". it could be argued that i ran into "darth grader" or the "grader of death" but on the same submission i received this.

    72 grabarkewitz 30559999 raw sub. to psa 10

    in the past i've been able cross BGS 8's and 8.5's to PSA 8 s and 9
    on regular basis, but i had to stop because i injured myself cracking a BGS holder
    imageimage
  • Here's my x-over experience -- all 1968T Baseball, 84 cards and all started as PSA-8's. Most were submitted in slabs, a small number were cracked out and submitted raw

    After x-over
    7 ended up in SGC-96 holders (9.0)
    13 ended up in SGC-92 holders (8.5)
    42 ended up in SGC-88 holders (8.0)
    14 ended up in SGC-86 holders (7.5)
    8 ended up in SGC-84 holders (7.0)

    Using the 1-10 scale, these 84 cards average 7.98.

    So, my conclusion is that, on average SGC and PSA are nearly identical in their "toughness". Certainly, their opinions often differ...but when viewed over a large enough population, everything averages out.

    Dr S. of the Dead Donkeys MC
  • aro13aro13 Posts: 1,961 ✭✭✭
    srs1a-Very interesting data, I always enjoy reading about crossovers. Was there anything consistent about the cards in each holder ie. Did the cards that went up to 9's -were they too off center to meet PSA 9 standards? The cards that dropped to 7's - were the corners too weak to merit the SGC 8 grade? or was it just random?
  • jackstrawjackstraw Posts: 3,762 ✭✭✭
    1. i may be wrong but dimitri young is a buyer of already graded sportscards?i don't think he submits so to say that psa is losing one of their clients is probably not true. psa makes money one time on a card that dimitri young buys and thats when its submitted? i could be wrong.
    2. gai's little black sleeve sucks i can't stand the not so arrow head corners. i hope somebody is reading this from gai.
    Collector Focus

    ON ITS WAY TO NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92658
  • srs1a,
    your point is noted, the 84 68's you crossed from PSA to SGC is probably greater than the total amount of cards i've cracked and crossed to PSA from SGC, BECKETT, and SCD ( yeah, i know). the larger number is undeniably a better representation than my handful, but why SGC? i don't follow the SGC market but do your former PSA 8's command a higher premium in their SGC 88 &92 holders (assuming that you are buying the holder and not the card) ?
    with the 71's that i mentioned, at the time i bought them the market for 71 psa 8's was very hot, i got the SGC 88's for considerably less than what the PSA 8's were going for but for more than than what PSA 7's were getting, by cracking and crossing i took a hit . could the higher price for PSA 8's be attributed to the popularity of the set registry or confidence in a particular company?
  • jackstrawjackstraw Posts: 3,762 ✭✭✭
    he has an sgc graded 68 set. i don't think he cares about resale value. maybe he likes sgc?
    Collector Focus

    ON ITS WAY TO NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92658
  • qualitycardsqualitycards Posts: 2,811 ✭✭✭


    << <i>psa makes money one time on a card that dimitri young buys and thats when its submitted? i could be wrong >>


    JACKSTRAW - You are correct! Same applies to Topps, when Mickey Mantle cards (raw or graded) changes hands, Topps made
    their money when the card was opened 40 years ago, and although a 1962 Mantle in a PSA-10 may sell for a mint, Topps no longer receives any profit, only the exposure of the new cards value...jay
  • theBobstheBobs Posts: 1,136 ✭✭
    Jay,

    Agreed. The point where Topps/PSA are no longer alike is future dealer decisions on which grader to submit to. If a high profile collector(s) are known to switch from PSA to GAI, might not this potentially influence future submissions? Or perhaps if high profile GAI cards start to outsell PSA cards in auctions, this could negatively impact PSA? Just pointing out where the Topps/PSA comparison ends. I don't endorse this line of thought necessarily.

    An example is the SGC buyer from southern Indiana. He only buys SGC, and he pays STRONG prices. If I had a killer raw card that I knew he needed, I might give SGC a submission. Certainly the existance of this one buyer hasn't changed the market share of either company on future gradings. But its an influence to keep in mind going forward.

    Each grading company readily publicizes sale prices of cards in their slab, even though they aren't compensated above the initial grading fee. They must feel that this publicity has a positive impact on future submissions, prestige, and/or market share.

    To my knowledge, Topps has never advertised sale prices of Topps cards on the secondary market.
    Where have you gone Dave Vargha
    CU turns its lonely eyes to you
    What's the you say, Mrs Robinson
    Vargha bucks have left and gone away?

    hey hey hey
    hey hey hey
  • jackstraw,
    i wasn't aware he had a SGC set of 68's. i have no intent on selling my cards either but contrary to what the ancient egyptians thought i won't be taking my cards into the afterlife. in all seriousness, while it is a hobby for me , there is long term investment potential involved and i would like to maximize the return for my future generations. i'm trying to understand the lure of some of the other options out there. for example, i'm working on a '72 topps bb in psa 8 or better, with a concentration on 9's along with a mild interest in 10's. i saw DSL sell a high numbered PSA 10 stan bahnsen in excess of 400.00 is there a similiar interest in SGC commons in the 96 grade? or are PSA cards selling at an inflated rate across the board because of the registry? i'm not new to collecting but i am relatively new to building high end graded sets. i haven't registered any of my sets at this point and quite frankly i may never do it. by buying PSA cards am i paying for the confidence they have garnered or the fact that they have the only registry at this time? will the key cards that are in other companies holders spike in value if they start a registry and will the commons follow suit? i am curious.
  • MantlefanMantlefan Posts: 1,079 ✭✭
    Here's a scenario: Dmitri shows up as a spokesperson for GAI. "Hi fans. I turned my PSA 10's into GAI 10's. You should too!"

    Could that possibly happen?image
    Frank

    Always looking for 1957 Topps BB in PSA 9!
  • I want to know who convinced Mr. Young to do such a thing, sounds to me like a losing proposition...Not bashing GAI but come on now, PSA is proven, GAI is, well GAI....No matter how much money you've got once those cards are out of PSA holders they are gone, those 1/1's can't be brought back even if your Bill Gates! Unless of course you work something out with PSA to reholder them but I am sure they will want to re-grade them...Doesn't make sense to me there has to be something we don't know.

    VBC
  • BasiloneBasilone Posts: 2,492 ✭✭


    << <i>Here's a scenario: Dmitri shows up as a spokesperson for GAI. "Hi fans. I turned my PSA 10's into GAI 10's. You should too!" >>



    I guess it beats the Fritsch boys pimping SCD....but I doubt any serious collector would be swayed.
  • I was in a debate, a nice way of saying it, on the Network 54 board. I deal mainly in PSA cards, I have some SGC and GAI. I said that I deal in what my customer base is asking for. If I had a growing customer base for GAI or SGC, I would have a growing inventory of that service. If Mr. Young is a strong buyer of GAI and gets others to change, GAI should be getting more business. Cards, like everything else, are a business of supply and demand. The greater demand for GAI, the greater the supply will become, and prices. PSA was not the first grading service, but they did capture the market. Many think that they are not working to maintain their current market share. The posters on the 54 board suggested that I offer SGC cards and provide my customers with a better product and explain why they should be looking at SGC cards. At the last Fort Washington show that I was at, I sold a 1954 Bowman Ashburn SCD 8.5 card for a primium over a PSA 8. I sold it for the card, which was a blazer, not the holder. I had others pass on it because of the holder. This is very common that people pass on a grading company, so like I said before, if my customers ask for GAI cards, I will send more in to GAI.
  • jackstrawjackstraw Posts: 3,762 ✭✭✭
    this is still rumor or has davillio come up with some proof? i am still waiting for the big collector to switch his collection to gai like he said on the sgc board on oct 24.
    Collector Focus

    ON ITS WAY TO NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92658
  • 1420sports1420sports Posts: 3,473 ✭✭✭
    Maybe Dmitri used the exemplar service. That way he would still have the PSA grade attached to it. If there is a card in a GAI holder (which is the superior holder in terms of design and security, imho) with a grade of 9 and the original PSA label with a grade of 9, then everyone wins. Dmitri gets a better holder and keeps the resale value - after all it is still a PSA 9 isn't it?
    collecting various PSA and SGC cards
  • aro13 -- no, it wasn't random...but it wasn't as you describe either. It you look at the numbers, a small number of cards got bumped up a full grade or down a full grade. I'd bet if you resubmitted the same number of cards to PSA, the outcome wouldn't be too different. This is not meant to me a knock on PSA, but there are cards that are strong and weak for the grade -- and if another grader looked at them on another day, the result might be different. The 96's that I got look like mint cards to me, and the 84's look nm.

    highgrade, as jackstraw said, I've got a '68 SGC set. On long term return, who knows what the future may bring and I have no plans to sell anytime soon (my daughter is only 2, so I won't have to sell if for her college education for quite a while!).

    VBC, exactly who put PSA on the map...and who is now at GAI? I have no GAI cards and no real interest in them...but I think your statements are a bit off base.
    Dr S. of the Dead Donkeys MC
  • kobykoby Posts: 1,699 ✭✭


    << <i>Maybe Dmitri used the exemplar service. That way he would still have the PSA grade attached to it. If there is a card in a GAI holder (which is the superior holder in terms of design and security, imho) with a grade of 9 and the original PSA label with a grade of 9, then everyone wins. Dmitri gets a better holder and keeps the resale value - after all it is still a PSA 9 isn't it? >>



    If Dmitri Young used the exemplar service, all of the cards remain in their original holder. The only difference is a silver sticker on the back of the holder with GAI's grade. (or does Gai slab the card with a PSA sticker on the back?)

    If it is the former, then the first post is very misleading. Perhaps Davalillo can clarify. Is his entire colelction in GAI black holders now?




Sign In or Register to comment.