Home PCGS Set Registry Forum

Burned or not Burned

CurrinCurrin Posts: 1,520 ✭✭✭✭✭

I purchased a 2000-D MS67 PSGS Kennedy half from an eBay auction. I got a little zealous in the pursuit. At the close, I had successfully bided $221.57 for this coin (including shipping cost). I have never paid this much for a clad coin before. I have been looking for this coin for several months. The POP report is 33/0 in PCGS, therefor, I do not see it offered much. Trends value this coin for $65.00. PCGS coin price guide is $75.00. From the surface, the coin is not of the value that I paid. So, the question to the panel of board experts, did I bid too much? The second question is why is PCGS coin price guide so low? I can understand Trends being low, because CW list composite values of all coins by all grading services. On the other hand, I will tend to rely more on the PCGS coin guide being correct. This does not appear to be true. UNLESS, I BIDED TOO MUCH!
My 20th Century Type Set, With Type Variations---started : 9/22/1997 ---- completed : 1/7/2004

My 20th Century Gold Major Design Type Set ---started : 11/17/1997 ---- completed : 1/21/2004

Comments

  • Currin,

    Based on your thread and question, the quick (but safe) answer is time will tell.

    If you have been searching this for 3 years AND this was the first one you saw available AND you completed/upgraded your set AND you have searched 500 mint sets from 2000 with nothing close to a MS67 AND 3 years from now the pop is maybe 33 to 40 AND whenever you decide to sell it you can get your money back (or even make a profit), then you probably did good. Or, if none of the previous apply but you had the money, so to you the amount did not matter as much as the satisfaction, then that is fine too,

    If neither of the previous apply, then maybe you paid too much. Whatever the assesment, enjoy the coin and remember, you only live once and you can't take $ with you.
    My eBay Items

    I love Ike dollars and all other dollar series !!!

    I also love Major Circulation Strike Type Sets, clad Washingtons ('65 to '98) and key date coins !!!!!

    If ignorance is bliss, shouldn't we have more happy people ??
  • You got burned. It is a $3 coin outside the holder.
  • BearBear Posts: 18,953 ✭✭✭
    Currin, we are collectors. Sometimes we do pay too much for a coin, but if that is the only one

    you have seen in several years for sale, then you were right in going for it. Its not as if you paid

    thousands of dollars for it. Feel good about getting a coin you needed and wanted.image
    There once was a place called
    Camelotimage
  • RussRuss Posts: 48,514 ✭✭✭
    Currin,

    The CU price guide is wildly inaccurate. In most cases it's too high, but in the business strike Kennedys many of the prices listed are far below what the market has been bringing.

    As you're obviously aware, the 2000-D in MS67 does not come up with any real frequency. When one does become available it consistently brings right in the range that you paid to get the coin.

    BTW, feel free to ignore modern bashers who possess some strange fixation on the need to try and tell others how stupid their purchases are. They generally tend to be people who contribute next to nothing to this world in general, and this forum in particular.

    Russ, NCNE
  • wondercoinwondercoin Posts: 16,974 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Curin: I would personally buy one sight-seen for anywhere between around $100 and $500++ in MS67, depending upon the quality of the coin. In other words, there is a coin in that plastic - if it is a high end MS67 specimen, no question you did exceptionally well with your buy IMHO. image Regards. Wondercoin
    Please visit my website at www.wondercoins.com and my ebay auctions under my user name www.wondercoin.com.
  • braddickbraddick Posts: 24,151 ✭✭✭✭✭
    These 2000-D's are notorious for water spots. If your has NONE then you UDERpaid and received a bargain. If it has a few, not in the focal areas, you did ok. If yours is blanketed with these spots then you overpaid.

    I have one in NGC MS66 I'm pleased with because although it has the ticks of a 66, NO spots.

    peacockcoins

  • CurrinCurrin Posts: 1,520 ✭✭✭✭✭
    The description was as follows:

    “This Kennedy half has great striking quality and luster, no toning or spots”.

    I attached a file of picture which is not all that great. I would assume form the description there are no spots. I have a 2000-P 67 that I purchased form Mitch a year or so ago. I would hope by the description that this coin would be as nice as that one. Do everyone else use the pictures or the description when purchasing? I do not find pictures all that useful. What do everyone else think?
    My 20th Century Type Set, With Type Variations---started : 9/22/1997 ---- completed : 1/7/2004

    My 20th Century Gold Major Design Type Set ---started : 11/17/1997 ---- completed : 1/21/2004
  • braddickbraddick Posts: 24,151 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Well, I see a touch of haze on the portrait and a couple of possible spots just in the upper left field (next to Kennedy's hairline) but that could be the photography.
    I do believe, my fine young collector, you SCORED! image

    peacockcoins

  • LincolnCentManLincolnCentMan Posts: 5,347 ✭✭✭✭
    If you see something you want and it's easily affordible, buy it. I bought a pop 2 NGC 1927-P lincoln cent for $90. I can easily get a 65RD example for that. But I collect browns... where am I going to find another one??? Pop 2/0 in 65BN... emm... $50 over priced.... emmmmm.... sold.

    David
Sign In or Register to comment.