What do you think was the most controversial U.S. coin minted?

The chain cent comes to mind as a controversial design (something to do with slavery?). It was quickly replaced with another design.
Do you know of any other coins that had designs that were considered offensive by some?
Dan
Do you know of any other coins that had designs that were considered offensive by some?
Dan
0
Comments
09/07/2006
mcinnes@mailclerk.ecok.edu">dmcinnes@mailclerk.ecok.edu
Regarding the chain cent, the chains on the reverse were misinterpreted to symbolize slavery, but they really represented the unity of the 13 colonies, hence 13 chain links.
Other examples would also include the following:
1. SBA $
2. BTW and Wash.Carver commems.(some thought it represented communist ideals)
3. Mckinley gold commems (Some thought it was too socialist)
Brian.
Shep
Neil
Camelot
Tyler
Doggedly collecting coins of the Central American Republic.
Visit the Society of US Pattern Collectors at USPatterns.com.
i thinks that the arkansas clinton quarter is far and away the best as for the most controversial usa coin
i am surprised they would issue something like that even though it is 100% true!
i would like the have one of those clinton quarters slabbed proof 69 deep cameo at pcgs!
i will offer $1000 sight
unseen for a slabbed pcgs proof 70 utlra cameo and a ms 70 both of this clinton arkansas quarter
sincerely michael
mcinnes@mailclerk.ecok.edu">dmcinnes@mailclerk.ecok.edu
A quick look at the back of the bill showed his politically correct nature and total lack of respect for history or the founding fathers, and the resaon why he forced it back into circulation.
He had the famous painting of the signing of the Declaration of Independance altered to include a black man as a signer.
Seems not too many folks are aware of that even today. I have a HUGE problem with revisionist history.
John Marnard Keynes, The Economic Consequences of the Peace, 1920, page 235ff
<< <i>And nobody has yet mentioned the work of the villiage idiot, Jimmy Carter. When he brought back the $2 dollar bill, people wondered why.
A quick look at the back of the bill showed his politically correct nature and total lack of respect for history or the founding fathers, and the resaon why he forced it back into circulation.
He had the famous painting of the signing of the Declaration of Independance altered to include a black man as a signer.
Seems not too many folks are aware of that even today. I have a HUGE problem with revisionist history. >>
Sorry, Deadhorse. That was Pres. Ford. BTW, I use $2 bills all the time.
The SBA was the most controversial coin coming in such close conjunction to the ruckus over the ERA.
There is not evidence for any significant contemporary complaint over the SLQ.
Also, according to the BEP, "There are no images of African-Americans printed on U.S. currency."
Link
Glenn
<< <i>I took great umbrage at the bare breast on the SLQ's lady LIBERTY....hardly any detail, too covered up and less tittillating than most other naked art. Come on mint people show some skin! Tyler >>
According to Bowers, that is just an old wives tale. Sure, the bare breasted quarter had its detractors, but all in all it was really just a minting issue.
The Type I's didn't stack well.
peacockcoins
<< <i>
Sorry, Deadhorse. That was Pres. Ford. BTW, I use $2 bills all the time.
The SBA was the most controversial coin coming in such close conjunction to the ruckus over the ERA.
There is not evidence for any significant contemporary complaint over the SLQ. >>
I sit corrected, I was sure it was Carter, it certainly fit his MO anyway. Ford was no bright bulb either.
My apologies to village idiots everywhere.
My quick google research shows the $2 bill as reissued April 13, 1976. Thomas Jefferson's birthday, coincidentially.
The back was re-done as an "artist's reconception". "A rose by any other name."
John Marnard Keynes, The Economic Consequences of the Peace, 1920, page 235ff
Glenn
The SBA $1 might not have been controversial, but it was definitely political correctness run wild -- I wonder how many in the non-collecting public even know or care what most US coins look like these days.
<< <i>I think the whole don't stack well issue was directed at the $20 high reliefs and possibly the incuse gold Indians, wasn't it? As far as the revealing miss Liberty, I think the addition of chain mail was inspired by America's entry into WWI, was it not? But that may have an element of the wive's tale too. >>
I just went and looked it up. you're partly right. Instead of going back and editing my post (above yours) I'll make the correction here (so your post will make sense): It wasn't a stacking issue it was a minting issue. The quarter didn't strike up easily and by the replacement of the reverse stars and eagle the quarter then did a bit better. I read where the change to the obverse was an afterthought and not directily due to pressure placed on the Mint by the general public although later that is what some would have you believe.
peacockcoins
William T. Gibbs
News Editor
Coin World
News Editor
Coin World