For the (not so) old timers - Remember 1964?
1964 wasn't all that long ago. The last of the silver coins were struck. The roll boom was over or ending. Kennedy halves were struck for the first time. In August of 1964 I turned four, but (except for the roll boom) I sort of remember it all. It wasn't that long ago.
Now, here's the funny part. In 1964, 100K+ Gem BU 1926-S nickels were no older than 1964 Kennedys are today. Somehow, it's strange to me. Any thoughts from the philosophers out there?
Now, here's the funny part. In 1964, 100K+ Gem BU 1926-S nickels were no older than 1964 Kennedys are today. Somehow, it's strange to me. Any thoughts from the philosophers out there?
Andy Lustig
Doggedly collecting coins of the Central American Republic.
Visit the Society of US Pattern Collectors at USPatterns.com.
Doggedly collecting coins of the Central American Republic.
Visit the Society of US Pattern Collectors at USPatterns.com.
0
Comments
My 1866 Philly Mint Set
1964 was the start of the death of the half dollar being a useful coin.
As for 1926-S Buffalo nickels at that time, they were either long gone from circulation or had their dates completely warn off. I was searching $200 bags of nickels at that time and never found one. There were plenty of Buffalo nickels in the bag but 99% of them with readable dates were 1934 to 1937. Never found a circulated 38D buff come to think of it either.
Got quoins?
Shep
Experience the World through Numismatics...it's more than you can imagine.
<< <i>In 1964, 100K+ Gem BU 1926-S nickels were no older than 1964 Kennedys are today. >>
And today we had $30,000 proof 1963 cents. But in 1964 the 1926-S nickel was not 100K, or even 30K. Does this tell us anything about values of the early 60's coins in yet another 40 years? I don't think so.
Joe
All those Frankies gone to waste.
Oh the days...
W.C. Fields
">Franklin Halves
">Kennedy Halves
celebrate the moment
K S
<< <i>Still found an ocasional SLQ with luster, SLQ's were common. >>
I assume you misspoke here. I never saw a lustrous SLQ and I started in 1957. By '64
most of these had the date worn off. The only old high grade quarters were the occasional
1932 Washington or a few from the early forties or later.
The clads have held up much better and have circulated with almost no interference from
collectors for longer than the silver Washingtons*. They are not as heavily worn because
they do not circulate nearly as fast as the silver did. They are also more durable and light-
er. This has all led to the newer coins being somewhat more evenly worn and the scarcer
pieces circulating right alongside their more common counterparts.
*The oldest silver Washington was only 32 years old in 1964 and the oldest clad is now 38.
K S
"I assume you misspoke here. "
No. Do remember laying my eyes on two or three. I grew up in the Appalachians and i suppose some folks had money squirreled away for some time. Once went to a friends house and his grandma pulled out some confederate currency. She wasn't a collector it was left to here by her folks. Kinda like i have MPC left over from some years back.
W.C. Fields
<< <i>Sure I remember 1964 I was born that year, nothing else to add. >>
Piker !!!
Child of the 50's (by 21 days
I was 17 in 64. Had a stupid fight with my highschool sweetheart and we broke up. Now almost 40 years later I have her back.
Jon
PS: The 64 Kennedy (or anything else modern) will never be like a 26S nickel was then.
All good things must come to an end!~
Dan
First Place Winner of the 2005 Rampage design contest!