Home U.S. Coin Forum

Question about an ebay auction i had.

I had 2 bidders the first bidder bid 7.50 for all 3 of the wall hangings. The second bidder bid 10.50 for 2 wall hangings. Here is the auction link #3012953086 im kinda confused this was the first dutch auction I have run.

My question is the second bidder has the high bid with 10.50 he wants 2 wall hangings. the first bidder wants all 3 at 7.50 each. When I go to send the invoice to the second bidder it only comes up as 7.50 and not 10.50 why is that. shouhld i ask him if he wants all 3 and cut the first bidder out. or shouhld i ask the first bidder if he wants the last wall hanging i have at the 7.50. ??


I know this is such a newbee things but since this is the first dutch auction I have had I do need the help


Byron
Im unemployed again after 1.5 years with Kittyhawk they let me go. image

My first YOU SUCK on May 6 2005

Comments

  • RussRuss Posts: 48,514 ✭✭✭
    In a Dutch auction, the lowest bid is the bid for all, so one bidder gets two at $7.50 (the one who bid $10.50 for two) and the other bidder gets one at $7.50 (the one who bid $7.50 for three).

    Russ, NCNE
  • NoGvmntNoGvmnt Posts: 1,126
    Damn I hate that if that is infact true. Why would the second bidder get to cut the first bidder out at the first bidders price? The first bidder bid $7.50/each for all three but the second bidder could come in and get as many as he/she wanted at the first bidders price just by bidding higher but knowing he/she wouldn't have to pay his/her bid price? Unacceptable!!!

    Full disclosure: I was the first bidder.
  • That is how it works. It works pretty well when there are lots of biders. In this case the seller left money on the table.

    Someone once had 5 recent Canadian proof sets out there in a dutch auction. I wanted one set and there were only two other bidders. I bid fairly high to be sure I got a set. They all went too cheaply.

    If someone else had come in at $11 for 1 all would go for $10.50.
  • satootokosatootoko Posts: 2,720


    << <i>All winning bidders pay the same price per item—which is the lowest successful bid. This might be less than what you bid! >>

    This came straight from The Horse's Mouth
    Roy


    image
  • The dutch have to mess everything up.
  • baccarudabaccaruda Posts: 2,588 ✭✭
    10.50 was just his proxy. he could have bid $7.51 and still gotten them at $7.50. or he could have bid $500,000,000 and still gotten them at $7.50.

    the fact that no one bid more than $7.50 for the last one establishes the market value. it's all good.
    1 Tassa-slap
    2 Cam-Slams!
    1 Russ POTD!
  • NoGvmntNoGvmnt Posts: 1,126
    My point is, I bid $7.50/each for a quantity of all 3 that were available. So, since I bid for the entire quantity available I believe the first three should have went to the first bidder. The purpose of a Dutch auction is if the seller has a multiple of the same items for sale, say a quantity of 100, and the first bidder bid for 20, the second bidder bid for 20, the third bid for 20 and so on, when the auction ended all of the items would go for the lowest bid BUT the first bidder should get his quantity first, second bidder gets his quantity second and so on. Does anyone understand where I'm coming from?
    I don't know if Byron made a faux-pa by listing the three items as a "Dutch" auction when he might have just listed them as inclusive in a winner take all auction. act is, he probably would have gotten more money considering the second bidder seemed to be willing to bid $10.50/item. I contacted Byron here when he first listed the items and informed him that I was willing to buy the items "at his price" if he didn't receive any acceptable bids and he asked me to place a bid to get the auctionstarted, which I did, unfortunately to my chagrin. Oh well, that's what I get for being a nice guy, won't happen again.
    Jim
  • baccarudabaccaruda Posts: 2,588 ✭✭
    i kind of see your point but the second bidder was willing to pay the most for his, so he gets his first. if you had bid $10.51 x 3 then you'd have gotten all 3 - but the new price would have been $10.51.
    1 Tassa-slap
    2 Cam-Slams!
    1 Russ POTD!
  • MadMartyMadMarty Posts: 16,697 ✭✭✭
    If you bid on three and there is only 1 left, you do not have to to take it. I hate dutch auctions!image
    It is not exactly cheating, I prefer to consider it creative problem solving!!!

  • baccarudabaccaruda Posts: 2,588 ✭✭
    dutch auctions are better suited to selling large volume without all the hassle - like 1,000 SAEs or something. a dutch with 3 items is probably not the best approach.
    1 Tassa-slap
    2 Cam-Slams!
    1 Russ POTD!
  • this is the last dutch auction i do . its easer to just list them single. I feel like im cheating nogvenmt image

    i dont like to cheat anybody on anything sorry about that .

    Byron
    Im unemployed again after 1.5 years with Kittyhawk they let me go. image

    My first YOU SUCK on May 6 2005
  • NoGvmntNoGvmnt Posts: 1,126
    Relax byron, you didn't cheat me, that's just the way it is. I know by the way I posted on this thread it seems that I was making a big thing out of it when it's not such a big thing. image

    NOW, WHERE IS THAT "SECOND" BIDDERS EMAIL ADDRESS?!!!image LOL
    Jim

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file