Where do you draw the line between curating and doctoring?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f9de7/f9de7bba792047ce816a3e52447604c3b0e50f1a" alt="Barry"
An earlier thread questioning sending a coin to NCS made me wonder...
Is there a fine line between "curating" and "doctoring," are they one and the same, or is there a big difference? How do you define each term and which, if either, is acceptable to you?
Is there a fine line between "curating" and "doctoring," are they one and the same, or is there a big difference? How do you define each term and which, if either, is acceptable to you?
0
Comments
I firmly believe in numismatics as the world's greatest hobby, but recognize that this is a luxury and without collectors, we can all spend/melt our collections/inventories.
eBaystore
I view doctoring as the INTENTIONAL ADDITION of agents or processes to a coins surface with the desire cause a NEW reaction on the surface of the coin. This covers most artificial toning situations. Doctoring would also enclude a whole seperate area of moving metal about on the coins surface (added mint marks, tooling, etc.).
I have no problem with true curation. In fact, I believev collectors have a duty to preserve their rare coins, which are historical artifacts, in such a manner to prevent their deterioration over time. I do not understand a position which urges a coin owner to take NO PROTECTIVE action, when a coin has surface contaminants which have/or will damage the coins surfaces.
Greg Hansen, Melbourne, FL Click here for any current EBAY auctions Multiple "Circle of Trust" transactions over 14 years on forum
such as toning by artificial means.One method preserves a coin, the other damages the coin thru
artificial enhancement.
Camelot
peacockcoins