Is this true?

mbbiker · December 28, 2002 9:46AM

link

did these really sell for that much at one time?

KlectorKid · December 28, 2002 9:52AM

I am pretty sure he is correct.

Russ · December 28, 2002 9:53AM

There's a big difference between "PCGS listed" and actual selling prices. I don't know if the PR69 brilliant was ever listed at $350, but if it was I seriously doubt it brought that kind of money. He may be consfusing it with the 69CAM.

Example: The PCGS "listed" price for the 69CAM is $295. The coin can be readily had for $100 to $110.

Russ, NCNE

wingedliberty · December 28, 2002 9:56AM

Looks like its going for a really nice price, I would bid on it.

Brian.

mbbiker · December 28, 2002 9:58AM

brian, go for it, i don't need one of these right now i'm just wasting time looking through auctions on e-bay.

Russ · December 28, 2002 10:06AM

Brian,

You have to be careful with this coin in slabs from that era. It may not be a good price because there are plenty of dogs with 69 on the label, and plenty of sellers who engage in deception by omission. You have only to look at my current auctions to see some examples of what I got snookered with when I first started and was stupid enough to believe the label.

Russ, NCNE

DCAMFranklin · December 28, 2002 10:35AM

Yes, that CU priceguide price is accurate. Back in 1999, they had ridiculous, highly exagerated prices on the '64 Kennedy in PR-69, PR-69 Cameo and all DCAMs. Then never sold for those kinds of prices. But back in '99, you could sell the coin for $55 to $65.

wingedliberty · December 28, 2002 11:16AM

I appreciate the expanded info on the 64.

Brian.

Bear · December 28, 2002 11:34AM

Listen to good old Russ, for he knoweth from whence he speakest.

Is this true?

Comments

Leave a Comment