Can ACG sue their bashers??
jmwarren
Posts: 155 ✭
Slander is hard to prove.
0
Comments
Dave
Must end life...in classic Lorne Green pose...from 'Battlestar Galactica'...best...death...ever!"
-Comic Book Guy
Russ, NCNE
Russ, NCNE
Dan
Dan
Dan
This is the first time I stand by my "one click - tri-postings".
ACG - Accugrade - the "Slabbing , Non-Grading Company" is the worse one in the business.
Dan
BBBWWWAAAHHHAAAHHHAAA !!!!
Joe
I just checked Google, and K6AZ's site comes in at #3 - right below accucrap. Number 4 is a site titled "Please Boycott Accugrade". Bwuahahahahahahahahaha!!!!!!!!!!!!
Russ, NCNE
BBBWWWAAAHHAAAHHAHAHHA
Joe
Bwuahahahahahahahahaha!!!!!!!!!!!!
It's when you know you're wrong, or should have known you were wrong, and you make the statement anyway.
That's slander.
You must also be specific in your statement.
To say, "PCGS blows chunks" is not slander.
To claim a member of the PCGS board- and to name him specifically with a wrong doing that you know to be factually incorrect is slander. Even then the accused must prove damages.
If you tell everyone in your neighborhood a certain named individual is a child rapist and you know it to be false he still must prove how you calling him a child rapist hurt his reputation and/or impeded on his livelyhood.
peacockcoins
One can protect themselves somewhat from this legal intimidation by being clear to only present facts (e.g., "I bought this coin for x but could only sell it for y", "ACG graded this coin x; on crackout, PCGS gave it a y"). Do not submit to the temptation to exaggerate. Make clear that your opinions are just that, opinions. You can state facts supporting them or describe your expertise as reasons why your opinions should be given greater weight. Be wary of statements that are really opinions but are stated as if they are fact ("XYZ is a ripoff", etc. (try "In my [highly esteemed] opinion...")). If you overstep the legal bounds of free speech, you increase your risks of a slander/libel suit. Definately speak your piece-that's what this country is all about. But remember, two wrongs do not make a right.
WH
[Where are all the experts from the "currency question" thread? ("it's a free country.....it's just his opinion", blah, blah, blah...)]
Well, truth is a complete defense. And just because you have an opinion doesn't mean you get to say whatever you want.
Grading is subjective and there is no standard grading guidelines that are widely accepted, and there is a book on the ACG system (or something like that) which may (!) indicate that the ACG system of grading differs greatly from others.
However when you file a lawsuit you have what's known as discovery. Interrogatories, requests for production, requests for admissions, etc.
Discovery often keeps people from filing lawsuits. In Texas, things are essentially discoverable if they are reasonably calculated to lead to admissible information. That's a really big area.
Issues of credibility are discoverable. Other lawsuits. Convictions. Dirtly laundry. Correspondence, computer files, bookkeeping records (to prove damages....), etc., etc., etc.....
[I wonder why Alan Hagar (sp?) isn't the owner, but rather his wife? (.........PublicData.com)]
Plus, what would ACG's damages be? A diminished reputation? Among who? People who don't know how to read? Or think?
I can just hear it now......"Plaintiffs now call Butthead to the stand." "Uhh...huh huh....thankths your majesthty......"
adrian
Judges, lawyers, and juries work based on precedence much more than the word of law.
That said, ACG was my first "certified" coin experience. I lost $20 on a $22 coin when I tried to get out of the coin (once I realized what was going on). I bought it from Mr. Hagar himself on eBay. I'm not bitter though, and I try VERY hard not to say bad things about him. He taught me a very valuable lesson: read and learn first, then buy.
saying that "i think ACG consistently overgrades coins" is a statement of fact. how could that be perceived as bashing or libel. ACG seems to be proud of their reputation in numismatic circles. heck, they've been at it for quite some time, many have been howling for almost as long and they have done................................nothing to change. in fact, they've attempted to defend their actions.
when so many see the same thing, draw the same conclusion, well...................
al h.
Looking for PCGS AU58 Washington's, 32-63.
*There are only twelve known, right?!
peacockcoins
NEWS ALERT: Braddick linked to DC Sniper Case, JFK Assassination, Global Warming, and People Who Drive Too Slow in the Fast Lane.
(neener neener!)
<< <i><< To claim a member of the PCGS board- and to name him specifically with a wrong doing that you know to be factually incorrect is slander. Even then the accused must prove damage. >> NEWS ALERT: Braddick linked to DC Sniper Case, JFK Assassination, Global Warming, and People Who Drive Too Slow in the Fast Lane. (neener neener!) >>
Hah!! I was five when JFK was shot, and beside... who's a bigger Kennedy fan than me?!
peacockcoins
Russ, NCNE