Too much focus on the coins that are regrades, upgrades, downgrades, etc.
TheNumish
Posts: 1,628 ✭✭
There has been so much discussion lately about how many times a coin has been submitted, undergraded, overgraded, crossed over, cracked out etc. etc. It gives the impression that every coin in a holder has been resubmitted over and over, worked on, dipped or just plain graded wrong. Makes the whole thing seem like a joke. Maybe I'm naive and it is.
In my opinion these coins are the exceptions and not the rule. I think most of the time the major grading services do a good job grading coins. The problem is that these coins really stand out and sometimes the lines between grades is grey and not black and white.
In my opinion these coins are the exceptions and not the rule. I think most of the time the major grading services do a good job grading coins. The problem is that these coins really stand out and sometimes the lines between grades is grey and not black and white.
0
Comments
for me i really do not care if a coin has been cracked many times regraded many times in many different holders and has more money into grading fees than the coin is worth!
just show me a coin in a plastic holder that is within my area of speciality and i will tell you if i like it or not and if i think it is a great extraordinary coin that i really like!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! whether it is for sale or not!!
that is all that matters to me the coin yes the holder is sometimes a nice bonus but for me it is the coin
PCGS holdered Ikes in MS63 or MS64 usually sell for grading fees only. The coin is free.
peacockcoins
Less regrades = less revenues.
No upgrades - no regrades
BTW !! an we grade this thread? After it gets resubmitted of course.
99% of the coin collectors don't give a hoot about PCGS or slabs in general.
Crackouts, regrades, borderliners and grading are highly misunderstood and the people who hang out here tend to be the more advanced collectors who are interested in the subtle differences that make a point difference in grade.
If anyone questions that, just check the latest Pop reports on MS64 clad coinage.
peacockcoins
I have lost a lot of confidence in the graded slab system but I'm grateful to this forum for helping me out of the dark.
Coyn
20 coins cracked out and resubmitted resulting in 3 upgrades, 4 downgrades, 1 BB, and 12 returned with same grade.
If we do not count the body bag (everyone should be allowed at least one mistake) and focus on the other 19 coins and to illustrate say all the coins were originally graded MS65 so we can judge the consistancy of the grading.
If all 19 coins were MS65 thus having an average grade of 65 then after being cracked out and resubmitted you ended up with 12 MS65, 4 MS64, 3 MS66. The resulting average grade would be 64.95.
That seems pretty consistant to me.
The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing.
Currently, I don't really care what the slab says (except for use in the PCGS coin registry). A coin is a coin and not a slab with writing. I think a sealed slab is a good way to safely store and handle your coin, identify your coin (w/ cert. #) and safely buy and sell online (by identifying it with cert. # in picture). The registry set is also fun. Of course buying from well-respected dealers on ebay and elsewhere is also key.
I don't think you can blame PCGS or the other reputable grading services. These are humans who grade and make decisions as to what the coin should be, using 1 point increments. Unless computers grade coins using decimals, its based on human judgment.
Proof Dime Registry Set
Camelot
If I send in 6 MS65 coins and I get back 3 in MS63 and 3 in MS67 I can say they average 65 so we have proven that coins can be graded with 100% accuracy.
Someone please pass the pipe, I've been left out.
Camelot
trying to assign a value to a coin based on it's condition in an atmosphere of
constantly evolving tastes and markets. Then on top of that, some gaurantee
the accuracy of their price predictions for all time on a ten point scale. Then when
a coin doesn't always get the exact same holder on numerous submissions, some
feel it's chicanery or fraud. Lighten up a little.
LSCC#1864
Ebay Stuff