Home Stamps Forum

High denomination plate block FDC's

ernie11ernie11 Posts: 2,096 ✭✭✭✭✭
edited March 23, 2026 3:57PM in Stamps Forum

Here are some high denomination plate block FDC's that I obtained from Artmaster back then - don't ask me what prompted me to collect these, I must've had more money than common sense. I originally paid $46.00 for the $9.95 Eagle, and $63.00 for the $14 Eagle.

Comments

  • 291fifth291fifth Posts: 25,079 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Not common items. I wonder how much of a market there is for them today?

    All glory is fleeting.
  • JBKJBK Posts: 17,262 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited March 19, 2026 9:01AM

    I always loved the high value stamps. I didn't have the commitment to buy stuff like this, but in my hobbies that involve sending a stamped return envelope or package I use high value stamps ($1 and above) whenever appropriate instead of a bunch of lesser values. That way I can keep the used stamps.

    I even bought a set of unused Postage Due stamps from the USPS back when they were phasing out special stamps for paying for insufficient postage. Even though they were not usable they still cost "face value".

    Buying $1 and $5 postage due stamps that could not be used for anything was quite a stretch for me. 😀

  • ernie11ernie11 Posts: 2,096 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited March 23, 2026 3:54PM

    Another one. Scott 2122a. I originally paid $39.00 for this.

  • ernie11ernie11 Posts: 2,096 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited March 23, 2026 3:54PM

    Yet another one. I originally paid $25.00 for this.

  • ernie11ernie11 Posts: 2,096 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited March 23, 2026 3:53PM

    Another Artmaster plate block FDC. Scott 3262. I originally paid $52.35 for this.

  • ernie11ernie11 Posts: 2,096 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited March 23, 2026 3:53PM

    Another Artmaster plate block FDC. Scott 2842. I originally paid $45.75 for this.

  • JBKJBK Posts: 17,262 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited March 23, 2026 2:45PM

    These are great but I must admit a little painful to see. That was real money back then, and even now. :*

  • ernie11ernie11 Posts: 2,096 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @JBK said:
    These are great but I must admit a little painful to see. That was real money back then, and even now. :*

    Believe me, I am pained, too, to think that I spent all this money on these FDC's back then. That being said, I do admit that I get a big kick out of looking at them after all these years. I'm going to be posting at least 2 more of these in the near future.

  • JBKJBK Posts: 17,262 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited March 23, 2026 6:32PM

    They're impressive, that's for sure.

    Some of them must be atleast a little scarce. Although, knowing how the stamp world works, used specimens on actual mailed envelopes are probably more "desirable". But, an Artcraft FDC is far more attractive than a big cardboard mailer.

    I did take a quick look at eBay and most sellers of high value FDCs seem to try to start the bidding close to face value, at least for singles.

  • ernie11ernie11 Posts: 2,096 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Scott 2592

  • ernie11ernie11 Posts: 2,096 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I hope this is the last of my high denomination plate block FDC's to post here. Scott O133.

  • 291fifth291fifth Posts: 25,079 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Lots of face value in this thread!

    All glory is fleeting.
  • JBKJBK Posts: 17,262 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @ernie11 said:
    I hope this is the last of my high denomination plate block FDC's to post here. Scott O133.

    This is an especially interesting one. It's an Artmaster cachet but the USPS return address apparently was how they were able to do an FDC with just the Official Mail stamps. Normally, a "civilian" stamp would also have to be added for the cover to be canceled.

    Was it a USPS issued cover? Issued with their permission? There had to be a connection of some kind.

  • ernie11ernie11 Posts: 2,096 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @JBK said:

    @ernie11 said:
    I hope this is the last of my high denomination plate block FDC's to post here. Scott O133.

    This is an especially interesting one. It's an Artmaster cachet but the USPS return address apparently was how they were able to do an FDC with just the Official Mail stamps. Normally, a "civilian" stamp would also have to be added for the cover to be canceled.

    Was it a USPS issued cover? Issued with their permission? There had to be a connection of some kind.

    I don't know - I can only say that I got it directly from Artmaster.

  • JBKJBK Posts: 17,262 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I poked around on ebay and it appears all FDCs are like this, although only Artmaster/Artcraft used the USPS return address.

    I know that for stamps like Bulk Rate and Non Profit a regular 1st class stamp needs to be added to the FDCs.

  • ernie11ernie11 Posts: 2,096 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Here's an FDC for the Scott 2092 sheet single with RW51 included.

  • ernie11ernie11 Posts: 2,096 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Not a plate block but a high denomination Priority Express Mail FDC from USPS with no cachet. Scott 4650.

  • ernie11ernie11 Posts: 2,096 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Not a plate block but a high denomination Priority Express Mail FDC from USPS with no cachet. Scott 4739.

  • 291fifth291fifth Posts: 25,079 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Have you ever encountered non-philatelic covers using those stamps?

    All glory is fleeting.
  • ernie11ernie11 Posts: 2,096 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @291fifth said:
    Have you ever encountered non-philatelic covers using those stamps?

    Not yet.

  • JBKJBK Posts: 17,262 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @291fifth said:
    Have you ever encountered non-philatelic covers using those stamps?

    Unfortunately, most all of them are used on packages, boxes, etc., which are not very conducive to saving/collecting.

Sign In or Register to comment.