Home U.S. Coin Forum
Options

The occurrence and appearance of golds and yellows on toned coins

In another thread, STONE asked whether there is any natural reaction that could turn a silver coin yellow or gold in color. The coin he was asking about appears to have been plated, but I decided to address the issue of gold and yellow colors on toned coins.

The first colors in the natural thin film toning progression are various shades of gold. In my classification system, I refer to them as light gold (class A), medium gold (class B), and amber (class C) to russet (class D). These are "first cycle" colors. Further along in the progression, we return to some colors that are more *yellow*. In my system, these include lemon yellow (class I), sunset yellow (class J), to orange (class K); these are "second cycle" colors. The point of the class designations is to show you where these colors fall in the progression. There is also a thrid cycle gold (class S) which is much more rare, and has an altogether different appearance.

It is possible to have a coin toned almost entirely in one color class. That essentially means that the toning layer is extremely uniform in thickness. This is much more likely on a small diameter coin; almost all larger colorfully toned coins will tend to exhibit multiple color classes. One way to achieve an extremely uniform coloration is through artificial toning - specifically, by heating in air to a controlled temperature, and allowing the coin to oxidize uniformly. However, it is also possible (although generally quite uncommon) to have uniform colors through natural toning. Usually in the natural toning, there will be some non-uniformities, e.g. in the recessses or at the perimeter. The heat-toned coins are usually too obvious - way too uniform and perfect.

Here are examples of first cycle gold colors, classes A & B (1895-O dollar), and class C (1887-O dollar):

image

image

Contrast the above with the more yellow second cycle colors (classes I, J) in these coins (I don't have any where it covers the entire coin, but it is theoretically possible, and much more likely on a smaller diameter coin):

imageimage

This one ranges from sunset yellow through orange (class K) and beyond:

image

Here is a coin with a nice amount of the rare third cycle gold, which comes after emerald green in the progression. (This coin does not belong to me.)

image

Finally, here are some banded rainbow toners that show the first cycle gold/amber (next to the untoned silver area) and second cycle yellows, in the context of a more complete spectrum of toning:

imageimage

Anyway, I hope this helps to show the different kinds of golds and yellows that are possible with natural (or artificial) toning. The natural toning will always show some gradations in color, even if subtle.

Best,
Sunnywood

Comments

  • Options
    anablepanablep Posts: 5,032 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Great coins & interesting read.

    The third cycle yellow picture is not showing on my monitor. Perhaps it's not linked?
    Always looking for attractive rim toned Morgan and Peace dollars in PCGS or (older) ANA/ANACS holders!

    "Bongo hurtles along the rain soaked highway of life on underinflated bald retread tires."


    ~Wayne
  • Options
    That 1st coin appears to have the
    classic dip stain toning. Just not fully
    rinsed after it was dipped. But still attractive,
    probably took many years to get that way.

    The others are probably AT, I have learned
    to steer very clear of those one sided toners,
    the tone boys are getting particularly good
    at the one sided AT.

    Regards, Steve K.
  • Options
    nicknut, sorry but you are completely mistaken. The gem 1895-O dollar is pedigreed to the Norweb collection and appears never to have been dipped (unlike some of the other Norweb coins, such as the 1893-S, which sadly suffered a different fate after the Norwebs sold it). Dip stain toning tends to be streaky, as one would expect from a liquid residue pattern, very different from the radially symmetric target distribution of the toning on this 1895-O (i.e. the toning clings concentrically to the perimeter). This coin has a pedigree back to 1908, when the Holdens bought it from J.W. Scott, and is believed to have been purchased directly from the New Orleans Mint by J.W. Scott in the year of issue, and held by him until 1908. (That is Dave Bowers' theory, not mine.) We can be sure that it has not been dipped, at least since 1908, if ever. The coin has acquired slightly more color since the Norweb Sale.

    As for the other coins, they are not even remotely AT. A better familiarity with the history of Morgan dollars and their unique rainbow bag toning would lead you to a different and more accurate conclusion.

    However, I do very much agree that it is wise to avoid collecting areas that you are less familiar with.

    Best,
    Sunnywood
  • Options
    RYKRYK Posts: 35,789 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Interesting discussion, Sunnywood. I tend to be attracted to coins that are of fairly uniform color (be they colorfully toned or just dirtied and patinated (is this a word???) ).
  • Options
    lathmachlathmach Posts: 4,720
    Great thread Sunnywood.

    Ray
  • Options
    TahoeDaleTahoeDale Posts: 1,785 ✭✭✭
    Doug,

    Thanks once more for your informative thread. And for being nice to the responder who thinks these beautiful coins might be AT. I don't know if I could do so, if a non-collector of my favorite series said that my best bust half seemed overgraded, less than well-struck, and should be dipped to get rid of the tarnish and dirt.

    This forum can be a great place to learn, and enjoy the wonders of many series that we do not collect.

    Hopefully, more of the newer members can learn from the pro's, like you, who know their s...t.

    TahoeDale
  • Options
    KentuckyJKentuckyJ Posts: 1,871 ✭✭✭

    Sorry to say I'm a bit suspicious when someone here since 2002 with 190 posts comes out making such a strong AT statement. Thanks, Sunnywood, for posting so many informative threads on the aspects of toning you've researched.

  • Options
    STONESTONE Posts: 15,275
    Thanks for another great post on toned coins Sunnywood.
    Due to the fact that my coin had just a limited amount of luster beneath the "yellow filament" on each side I grew extremely skeptical
    whether it could have occured naturally with such pronounced and bold yellow color.

    Your coins clearly dispell the idea that my coin was the 100% result of NT, and was/is most likely a plating job that is wearing off.

    I thoroughly enjoyed reading this informative thread and hope you continue with it image
  • Options
    BECOKABECOKA Posts: 16,957 ✭✭✭
    Sunnywood have you ever thought about publishing a book on this subject with lots of photos?

    I'd be a buyer. image
  • Options
    My apologies.

    Had a recent experience with a one sider,
    guess I let it color my opinion.

    Regards, Steve K.
  • Options
    SunnywoodSunnywood Posts: 2,683
    Thanks to all; yes I have considered a book on toning, although it would be so much work to do a really good job, with tons of illustrative photos !!

    nicknut, no problem. Among Morgans in particular, there are many legitimate one-sided toners because of the way they were stored in bags, and the way they reacted to those storage conditions. Also there are many one-sided end-roll toners from paper-wrapped bank rolls.

    At their best, these forums not only allow us to exchange facts, ideas and opinions, but also to learn something. I know I often learn from the better posts here ... and if I can return the favor by helping someone else learn, that's great.

    Best,
    Sunnywood
  • Options
    PCcoinsPCcoins Posts: 3,354 ✭✭✭
    If you do a book on toning I think other coins such as Franklins and Washingtons would be great to show how different coins tone.
    "It is what it is."
  • Options
    SunnywoodSunnywood Posts: 2,683
    I posted a similar thread over at TCCS (Toned Coin Collectors Society), and one of the members there came up with an image of a coin that is toned (on the reverse) almost entirely in 2nd cycle yellows, something I don't have in my collection. Here it is, mostly sunset yellow (class J) to orange (class K), with touches of red-magenta-blue down at the bottom. This is a great example of 2nd cycle yellows, and you can see how different the hue is from the 1st cycle gold/amber coins that I posted at the top of the thread.

    image
  • Options
    BBNBBN Posts: 3,761 ✭✭✭
    as I said in another thread, I've had some loose 2005 bison nickels sitting in a brown Nike shoebox since 2005 and they have turned a bright gold color. What in the shoebox could have caused the golden color?

    Positive BST Transactions (buyers and sellers): wondercoin, blu62vette, BAJJERFAN, privatecoin, blu62vette, AlanLastufka, privatecoin

    #1 1951 Bowman Los Angeles Rams Team Set
    #2 1980 Topps Los Angeles Rams Team Set
    #8 (and climbing) 1972 Topps Los Angeles Rams Team Set
  • Options
    SunnywoodSunnywood Posts: 2,683
    BBN, the colors in toning are caused by the thin film interference effect, which I have written about in other threads. If the environment in your shoebox caused the copper-nickel surfaces of your coins to develop an oxide-sulfide surface film (through natural chemical reactions), and if the film has the right thicknesses to produce yellow or gold toning, then you get gold-toned coins as a result.

    The point of this thread was to demonstrate that yellows and gold do occur throughout the natural toning color progression that results from the thin film interference effect. There are 1st cycle gold and amber colors, 2nd cycle yellow and orange colors, and the unique 3rd cycle gold color which is more rare, and beautiful. This can happen on nickels just as on silver coins. Wild colors are seen more often on Morgans only because of their unique specific history.

    Sunnywood

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file