Options
I would like to thank CAC for posting the Franklin FBL grading criteria online
Their website is actually turning out to be useful. They posted their grading criteria for Franklin Full Bell Lines and I hope more articles like this are to come.
Here is the link: Franklin FBL Criteria
I think this was well defined and I like that they show and discuss things like how a photo of the bell lines may seem like it is not FBL and how it actually is.
Here is the link: Franklin FBL Criteria
I think this was well defined and I like that they show and discuss things like how a photo of the bell lines may seem like it is not FBL and how it actually is.
0
Comments
<< <i>Their website is actually turning out to be useful. They posted their grading criteria for Franklin Full Bell Lines and I hope more articles like this are to come.
Here is the link: Franklin FBL Criteria
I think this was well defined and I like that they show and discuss things like how a photo of the bell lines may seem like it is not FBL and how it actually is. >>
..........i'm wondering if they'll do full bands, full heads etc. down the road? quite helpful, ben, thanks!
glad you value the criteria and appreciate the effort that went into establishing those guidelines .
Most saw fit to bash and mimic the photo's
........I have no doubt CAC and Mr. Lewis thank you for your kind words
Coin's for sale/trade.
Tom Pilitowski
US Rare Coin Investments
800-624-1870
I've known about a couple insider's integrity, all along.
``https://ebay.us/m/KxolR5
<< <i>Sooooo......CAC is looking at FBL pretty much the same as PCGS and not NGC then yes???? >>
How does NGC look at FBL? Did they post their criteria?
<< <i>
<< <i>Sooooo......CAC is looking at FBL pretty much the same as PCGS and not NGC then yes???? >>
How does NGC look at FBL? Did they post their criteria? >>
NGC has never openly published guidelines to just what constitutes Full Bell Lines on Franklin half dollars, but it is commonly thought that the stricter criteria, both sets of lines, must be full and complete, whereas PCGS is just looking at the bottom set of lines. There is so much leeway between the services on this designation it seems to float from coin to coin, grader to grader.
"Keep your malarkey filter in good operating order" -Walter Breen
<< <i>Sooooo......CAC is looking at FBL pretty much the same as PCGS and not NGC then yes???? >>
Yes.
<< <i> NGC has never openly published guidelines to just what constitutes Full Bell Lines on Franklin half dollars, but it is commonly thought that the stricter criteria, both sets of lines, must be full and complete, whereas PCGS is just looking at the bottom set of lines. There is so much leeway between the services on this designation it seems to float from coin to coin, grader to grader. >>
Also correct.
and they're cold.
I don't want nobody to shoot me in the foxhole."
Mary
Best Franklin Website
Just like FBL...the world may never know!
Remember, these coins were originally provided to CAC so that the CAC graders would have an "in hand" set to refer to. The posting of the set online as an educational tool was an afterthought. So the pics do have some limitations.
On coin 11, there is a long die crack running lengthwise thru the lower line, which gives it a somewhat broken appearance. But the important thing is, the "valley" between the lines is unbroken.
and they're cold.
I don't want nobody to shoot me in the foxhole."
Mary
Best Franklin Website
It's interesting to note that the only coin labeled with having full bell lines, the last coin dated 1959, also has the weakest strike among all of the examples given. What does that tell you?
leo
The more qualities observed in a coin, the more desirable that coin becomes!
My Jefferson Nickel Collection
others on these boards have commented they would like to see the obv. wisps of hair , the pass & stow , etc ........
before rendering their opinion as to whether a particular coin has FBL's .
Myself .............i feel the question is specifically about the bell line's ;
the rest of the coin : it's strike, luster, surfaces and grade are irrelevant .
until PCGS and NGC commit to publish pictorial standards there will be no end in sight
to the FBL mess
<< <i>R. Tomaska , for example - believes the entire coin should be well struck to receive the FBL designation ....
others on these boards have commented they would like to see the obv. wisps of hair , the pass & stow , etc ........
before rendering their opinion as to whether a particular coin has FBL's .
Myself .............i feel the question is specifically about the bell line's ;
the rest of the coin : it's strike, luster, surfaces and grade are irrelevant .
until PCGS and NGC commit to publish pictorial standards there will be no end in sight
to the FBL mess >>
debateble in my eyes than before I reviewed it.
FBL's will always be tricky little buggers..........
and the Franklin market will continue should the FBL designation become irrelevant