Home U.S. Coin Forum
Options

OK I have a sealed mint box with 96 2008 ASE dated 4-24

Open it or sell it sealed??

Comments

  • 57loaded57loaded Posts: 4,967 ✭✭✭
    selling it sealed will bring a wee bit more, right now, not much premium later, IMHO



  • Open it. And if you don't have any 2007 reverses, send them back to the Mint. I don't think people are paying for the "chance" to get a 2007 reverse...they want to know it IS a 2007 reverse.

    Edited to Add: I sold my opened one last Monday for $250.00, because I had a picture of it, too.
    "Toto, we're not in Kansas anymore"

    My Registry Sets
  • 4/25 is when they sent (and I rec'd) my last 12.....All 2008 rev's.... so opening sounds like a plan since the sealed box premium is minimal unless you're interested in FS/ER designation
  • keezkeez Posts: 842
    OPEN
  • Just a FYI, The May 12th edition of Coin World is reporting in a front page article the Mint estimates ~47,000 2008-W ASE's with the the 2007 reverse were inadvertently struck at the West Point Mint according to a statement given to Coin World by U.S. Mint spokesman Michael White on April 23rd. White also stated the figure represents approximately three shifts of production and that 15 dies with the 2007 Reverse were inadvertently employed in the 2008-W ASE production. On a rarity scale, the stated figure would put the 08/07 reverse variety in the 1995-W category as the lowest production ASE.
    Never teach a pig to sing. You'll waste your time and annoy the pig image

    image
  • BECOKABECOKA Posts: 16,961 ✭✭✭


    << <i>Just a FYI, The May 12th edition of Coin World is reporting in a front page article the Mint estimates ~47,000 2008-W ASE's with the the 2007 reverse were inadvertently struck at the West Point Mint according to a statement given to Coin World by U.S. Mint spokesman Michael White on April 23rd. White also stated the figure represents approximately three shifts of production and that 15 dies with the 2007 Reverse were inadvertently employed in the 2008-W ASE production. On a rarity scale, the stated figure would put the 08/07 reverse variety in the 1995-W category as the lowest production ASE. >>



    I sure picked a bad year to stop collecting these. image
  • adamlaneusadamlaneus Posts: 6,969 ✭✭✭
    Don't kick yourself too hard. The spotting issue is the same, isn't it? I love ASEs. Cheap ones.
  • BochimanBochiman Posts: 25,556 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>

    << <i>Just a FYI, The May 12th edition of Coin World is reporting in a front page article the Mint estimates ~47,000 2008-W ASE's with the the 2007 reverse were inadvertently struck at the West Point Mint according to a statement given to Coin World by U.S. Mint spokesman Michael White on April 23rd. White also stated the figure represents approximately three shifts of production and that 15 dies with the 2007 Reverse were inadvertently employed in the 2008-W ASE production. On a rarity scale, the stated figure would put the 08/07 reverse variety in the 1995-W category as the lowest production ASE. >>



    I sure picked a bad year to stop collecting these. image >>



    Maybe not.
    The 1995-W, when it was by itself, was hugely rare.

    However, with the production of the UNCs (W), they have 3 years, including this one, now, and, historically, the amount quote above would put it about 10% of the production is this variety.

    I think it's cool, but I think it is a subset of the 2008-W and not a collectible on its own. I'd like one, but I kind of compare these to the Washington Dollar MEL and the WIS extra leaf. Cool, but the prices run up then drop back down.

    For those that have them.....best wishes on making some major bank!
    For those that don't, but want them, hopefully they come back down. image

    I've been told I tolerate fools poorly...that may explain things if I have a problem with you. Current ebay items - Nothing at the moment



  • << <i>Maybe not.
    The 1995-W, when it was by itself, was hugely rare.

    However, with the production of the UNCs (W), they have 3 years, including this one, now, and, historically, the amount quote above would put it about 10% of the production is this variety.

    I think it's cool, but I think it is a subset of the 2008-W and not a collectible on its own. I'd like one, but I kind of compare these to the Washington Dollar MEL and the WIS extra leaf. Cool, but the prices run up then drop back down.

    For those that have them.....best wishes on making some major bank!
    For those that don't, but want them, hopefully they come back down. image >>


    IMO in terms of value, the 08/07 reverse ASE is somewhere in between the 2006-W 20th Anniversary ASE Blue Label pedigree which sells for ~$2,000 in a NGC MS70 and the 20th Anniversary ASE Black Label which sells for ~$500 in MS70 despite being the exact same coin as the standard 2006-W ASE issue, the only notable difference being the pedigree on the holder. The 08/07 reverse ASE being a unique variety should sell at a similar premium.
    Never teach a pig to sing. You'll waste your time and annoy the pig image

    image
  • lope208lope208 Posts: 1,960 ✭✭
    Well, I decided to gamble on this issue before it (potentially) gets out of reach. Just picked up an NGC 69 from a board member for $200 bucks. I wasn't gonna spend Uncle Sam's rebate, but figured what the heck, it's only 1/3 of it... image

    Hope they do go up eventually. I'm thinking of picking up a second.

    Edited to answer the OP's initial question...
    I would open them. I only bought 3 W's from the Mint for my collection, and they were all 2008 reverses.
    I thought about gambling on a bunch more straight from the Mint, but I believe they must have gotten whatever
    was left now that it's been brought to their attention.
    Successful BST transactions:
    commoncents123, JrGMan2004, Coll3ctor (2), Dabigkahuna, BAJJERFAN, Boom, GRANDAM, newsman, cohodk, kklambo, seateddime, ajia, mirabela, Weather11am, keepdachange, gsa1fan, cone10
    -------------------------
  • KaelasdadKaelasdad Posts: 1,232 ✭✭✭
    I Just opened 75 of them, packed on 4/22--delivered toay 4/28--0-75--all normal--looks like the mint stopped the migration. Some were obviously packed a bit crooked, and all were in very tight--probably went through QA before shipping. Most had perfect rerses, and dusty obverses (silver specks in field and sun)
  • rgCoinGuyrgCoinGuy Posts: 7,478
    96 X 25 =2400

    96 x 200 = 19,200

    I think I would have to look. image

    (Disclosure: All numbers are only a guess and should not be taken for more than that. I am making the assumption these are the "W" Mint mark.)

    imageQuid pro quo. Yes or no?
  • IMO in terms of value, the 08/07 reverse ASE is somewhere in between the 2006-W 20th Anniversary ASE Blue Label pedigree which sells for ~$2,000 in a NGC MS70 and the 20th Anniversary ASE Black Label which sells for ~$500 in MS70 despite being the exact same coin as the standard 2006-W ASE issue, the only notable difference being the pedigree on the holder. The 08/07 reverse ASE being a unique variety should sell at a similar premium.

    image
  • vplitevplite Posts: 1,385 ✭✭✭


    << <i>I Just opened 75 of them, packed on 4/22--delivered toay 4/28--0-75--all normal--looks like the mint stopped the migration. Some were obviously packed a bit crooked, and all were in very tight--probably went through QA before shipping. Most had perfect rerses, and dusty obverses (silver specks in field and sun) >>



    Future milk spots? image
    The Golden Rule: Those with the gold make the rules.
  • GrivGriv Posts: 2,804
    I've never had a ASE milkspot in an Intercept Shield. All my ASE's are in the double Intercept Shield boxes. I highly recommend them if you want to protect your investment.
  • 57loaded57loaded Posts: 4,967 ✭✭✭


    << <i>Just a FYI, The May 12th edition of Coin World is reporting in a front page article the Mint estimates ~47,000 2008-W ASE's with the the 2007 reverse were inadvertently struck at the West Point Mint according to a statement given to Coin World by U.S. Mint spokesman Michael White on April 23rd. White also stated the figure represents approximately three shifts of production and that 15 dies with the 2007 Reverse were inadvertently employed in the 2008-W ASE production. On a rarity scale, the stated figure would put the 08/07 reverse variety in the 1995-W category as the lowest production ASE. >>



    those were minted that date, then shipped to memphis?? on a big plane and pallett(s)

    so i wonder what the lag time is??

    although I cancelled all my mint orders for tis coin, weeks ago...just curious
  • 57loaded57loaded Posts: 4,967 ✭✭✭


    << <i>I've never had a ASE milkspot in an Intercept Shield. All my ASE's are in the double Intercept Shield boxes. I highly recommend them if you want to protect your investment. >>



    if you have em raw, i'd rinse in acetone...(JMHO)

    for those who have seen milk in raw, PCGS AND NGC slabs (i have), if you have been "lucky" more power to 'ya

    image
  • GrivGriv Posts: 2,804
    Like I said, I have plenty of these modern silver walkers and NONE of them have EVER toned in an Intercept Shield box and I once again recommend the double box to fully protect your investment. image

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file