Options
How would you handle this with PCGS?
dpoole
Posts: 5,940 ✭✭✭✭✭
Under the Heritage Legacy program, I submitted two 2006-W Plat $100 UNC coins on a walk-through while at FUN this year (I submitted on Thurs and they didn't get them back to me before I had to leave Sat at noon, but that's another story).
I put the MS69 up for auction on Ebay. The guy who is the lead bidder emails me through Ebay with a day or so to go, telling me that he checked the cert number under Cert Verification at the PCGS website, and found that the number corresponded to some $10 bullion coin! He was asking me if this were some sort of counterfeit.
I emailed PCGS, asking them to make a correction. They emailed me back, asking for front-and-back scans of both coins (both coins, as it turned out, had bad cert numbers). I sent those in.
Today, I get an email back, telling me "You are going to have to send these coins in for us to correct. There is no fee and you will need to submit it under Mechanical Error."
Needless to say, this is a major hastle, and created considerable jeopardy in that Ebay auction.
I'm sending the winner a duplicate, although unfortunately the duplicate is a First Strike, while the one I auctioned was not. So I think the winner will be happy, and I won't get a Neg. But it's possible that the First Strike would have drawn higher bids (this seems to be happening, however, inane you and I may consider that fact to be).
Has this ever happened to any of you? Did PCGS work out any arrangement about shipping costs or any other sort of compensation?
I've emailed them in reply asking those sorts of questions, but I'm wondering what's been your experience.
I put the MS69 up for auction on Ebay. The guy who is the lead bidder emails me through Ebay with a day or so to go, telling me that he checked the cert number under Cert Verification at the PCGS website, and found that the number corresponded to some $10 bullion coin! He was asking me if this were some sort of counterfeit.
I emailed PCGS, asking them to make a correction. They emailed me back, asking for front-and-back scans of both coins (both coins, as it turned out, had bad cert numbers). I sent those in.
Today, I get an email back, telling me "You are going to have to send these coins in for us to correct. There is no fee and you will need to submit it under Mechanical Error."
Needless to say, this is a major hastle, and created considerable jeopardy in that Ebay auction.
I'm sending the winner a duplicate, although unfortunately the duplicate is a First Strike, while the one I auctioned was not. So I think the winner will be happy, and I won't get a Neg. But it's possible that the First Strike would have drawn higher bids (this seems to be happening, however, inane you and I may consider that fact to be).
Has this ever happened to any of you? Did PCGS work out any arrangement about shipping costs or any other sort of compensation?
I've emailed them in reply asking those sorts of questions, but I'm wondering what's been your experience.
0
Comments
Russ, NCNE
I'd presumed this was some type of entry error, but apparently there're two other coins out there ($10 golds) that have the same cert numbers in the slabs. SO...either those or mine have to be cracked and fixed. And since I showed up first....
Here's a warning parable for coin collectors...
<< <i>But it's possible that the First Strike would have drawn higher bids (this seems to be happening, however, inane you and I may consider that fact to be). >>
David,
Can you edit your auction, stating the problem, and that the coin has the "First Strike"designation, and provide the correct cert #?
Can you add a picture of the "First Strike" coin?
What a PITA!
Good luck
<< <i>I'd presumed this was some type of entry error, but apparently there're two other coins out there ($10 golds) that have the same cert numbers in the slabs. >>
Is that what they told you? It seems to me that the database should not allow duplicate entries.
Russ, NCNE
<< <i>Can you edit your auction, stating the problem, and that the coin has the "First Strike"designation, and provide the correct cert #?
Can you add a picture of the "First Strike" coin? >>
Unhappily, the problem became apparent and the auction ended Sunday on a day PCGS was closed, and well before the complexity of the "fix" became known.
Update: Customer service offered to reimburse me the shipping fee if I mailed them a copy of the receipt for shipping.
Here's a warning parable for coin collectors...
I personally would just explain to the buyer the situation rather than sending a First Strike. Tell him it's a PCGS error and he can either wait for PCGS to correct the problem or you can refund his money in full. I would not give away something you feel is higher in value.
Editted to add: You should also be asking for compensation for their error. Something along the lines of free vouchers or the like.
<< <i>Update: Customer service offered to reimburse me the shipping fee if I mailed them a copy of the receipt for shipping. >>
they can't read the amount on the package?
<< <i>Is that what they told you? It seems to me that the database should not allow duplicate entries. >>
Further clarification from Customer Service:
The problem is not the cert number. The reason they came up on the database as 2007 $10 gold bullion coins is because my two coins were mislabeled with the wrong coin ID numbers. That's why they have to be sent back in for relabeling.
Here's a warning parable for coin collectors...
Keeper of the VAM Catalog • Professional Coin Imaging • Prime Number Set • World Coins in Early America • British Trade Dollars • Variety Attribution
Leave the gun, take the Canoli.
Clemenza
The Lincoln cent store:
http://www.lincolncent.com
My numismatic art work:
http://www.cdaughtrey.com
USAF veteran, 1986-1996 :: support our troops - the American way.
Thanks for the inspiration.
Customer Service has agreed to pay shipping both ways (WITHOUT my sending my receipt), relabel them correctly and with First Strike designations on both coins at no charge, and provide two free submission coupons.
I cc'd Homerunhall, but it appears not to have been necessary.
I'm happy with the outcome.
Thanks for your help! You people are all great, as usual.
Here's a warning parable for coin collectors...