Home U.S. Coin Forum
Options

Treasure from Junk (Slabs) Submission: The Cherrypicking Crackout Caper with a Top Pop...

If I have earned no other reputation on this forum, it is for a desire to stretch my numismatic dollars by venturing where many dare not go, into the realm of raw coins and questionable slabs. But, rejoice. Three very nice coins have been liberated from the prisons in which they were placed by the purveyors of putrid plastic (whew) and now are bathed in the light and goodness of PCGS blue ...

Submission 9007532 was posted today (received April 23), a regular submission of freebies for completed sets:

1961 PR-69 CAM Jefferson: Formerly ACG PR-69 DCAM and a $7 eBay snipe. A 14/0 coin. Hands down, the best Jeff in my set in terms of mirrors and luster. A stunner. A no-doubt DCAM reverse and an oh-so-close CAM-plus obverse. I was greedy. Guessed PR-69 DCAM. This coin boosted my early Jeff proofs into a tie for fifth current finest. At last!

1962 PR-68 DCAM Jefferson: Formerly PCI PR-69 Ultra Cameo. No snipe needed, $9. A 96/37 coin. Matched my expectations. One of the whitest DCAMs I have seen on an earlier Jeff proof.

1965 MS-66 CAM SMS Jefferson: Formerly NTC MS-67 CAM. The now-infamous mistake coin. Accidentally bid, and won, for $78. A 68/19 coin. At least it is worth what I bid. Pegged as MS-66 CAM, but PQ as such as very close to DCAM. Only a spot of brightness on far right of Monticello keeps it from such lofty status.

The moral of the story: There is treasure to be sifted from among the junk for those who care to search ... (i.e., buy the coin, not the slab.)

The submission contained only four other coins, of no particular note and a couple of outright mistakes, with the exception of a pretty, raw 1959 PR-68 Roosevelt, a surprisingly elusive and undervalued coin at 39/1. Currently stands as the lowest pop Roosie in brilliant 68 from 1954 to 1964.

Comments

  • lordmarcovanlordmarcovan Posts: 43,847 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>The moral of the story: There is treasure to be sifted from among the junk for those who care to search ... >>




    ...and those who are vigilant for hidden problems.

    Still, it can be done, as you have proven. Bravo. I'm sure your Jeffs are breathing a sigh of relief. image

    Explore collections of lordmarcovan on CollecOnline, management, safe-keeping, sharing and valuation solution for art piece and collectibles.
  • Congrats RGL!! image
    Glenn
  • CoinosaurusCoinosaurus Posts: 9,644 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Pretty amazing......even if ACG had called it a 70 they would still be only one point off image

    Who is gonna be the first service to use the "71" grade???? Never say never. I went to the ANA grading class a few years back and one of the major players at the grading services there flatly stated, "we will never grade a coin a 70".
  • RussRuss Posts: 48,514 ✭✭✭


    << <i>If I have earned no other reputation on this forum, it is for a desire to stretch my numismatic dollars >>



    You are, indeed, a renowned tightwad. image

    Once again, some excellent cherrypicking!

    Russ, NCNE
  • Dog97Dog97 Posts: 7,874 ✭✭✭
    That's great! The way you talk about them I can tell you're really into your Jeffersons.
    Change that we can believe in is that change which is 90% silver.
  • braddickbraddick Posts: 24,800 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Excellent! Your Thread goes to show that knowledge is power. Know your Series and what to look for and true GEMS await you.
    Great successes.

    peacockcoins

  • Cam40Cam40 Posts: 8,146
    It can be done.
    Good eye.
  • BNEBNE Posts: 772
    Congratulations, Randy, on your entry into the "top five!" The way you have done this through patience, and careful selection, also provides a "moral" for those who think that the only way to get to the top is by paying stupid money.

    I agree that nice coins can, and do, make it into the "wrong" holders. I often hear people say that they would never buy a coin in a "______ slab." If they are truly boycotting the product on principle, that's one thing. But to assume the coin in the holder is crap may be foolish.

    Congrats, again!!! I was there "when!"
    "The essence of sleight of hand is distraction and misdirection. If smoeone can be convinced that he has, through his own perspicacity, divined your hidden purposes, he will not look further."

    William S. Burroughs, Cities of the Red Night
  • RGLRGL Posts: 3,784
    Thanks, Barry and everyone, for your comments. I agree with Barry's observations that if you search for good buys, make some good decisions and know some good people, you can compile a top five set without mega bucks. I do not mind saying that in my No. 5 early Jefferson proof set, the most expensive coin was $330.
  • littlewicherlittlewicher Posts: 1,822 ✭✭
    Did you crack them out of the slab before submitting them?


    For some life lasts a short while, but the memories it holds last forever.
    -Laura Swenson

    In memory of BL, SM, and KG. 16 and forever young, rest in peace.
  • RGLRGL Posts: 3,784
    Yes, that was a no brainer ... all were cracked.
  • littlewicherlittlewicher Posts: 1,822 ✭✭
    I recently scored this coin off Ebay. link

    I know usually the cameo is overdramatized on his pictures, but it wasn't on this coin! When I got it, I was amazed to see that it was DCAM and would probably get DCAM at PCGS.


    For some life lasts a short while, but the memories it holds last forever.
    -Laura Swenson

    In memory of BL, SM, and KG. 16 and forever young, rest in peace.
  • ksteelheaderksteelheader Posts: 11,777
    Of course it can be done. Congrats on your coins. See this link about my find...KenLink
  • RGLRGL Posts: 3,784
    Love that SMS Jeff, wicher ... jwcameo -- Jeff Werlin -- is a good seller. Congrats.

    Nice score on your Franklin as well, ks ... there are good coins to be found in lower tier holders at bargain prices if you are judicious. image
  • MacCoinMacCoin Posts: 2,544 ✭✭
    thats the way to go RGL congrads.


    Coinosaurus I've seen many more MS70 Jeffs in ICG than in ACG.
    image


    I hate it when you see my post before I can edit the spelling.

    Always looking for nice type coins

    my local dealer
  • DCAMFranklinDCAMFranklin Posts: 2,862 ✭✭
    RGL- How often have I read on this Forum, "if that coin would make that grade, why would the owner have submitted it to ACG/NTC?"

    Yet, your results are further proof that there are many coins out there in 3rd tier holders that are accurately graded, or barely miss the mark. The cynics and close-minded Members that summarily dismiss other services' holders are doing newer members of the hobby a great disservice by not allowing for the "diamonds in the rough" out there. It is WELL worth one's time to assess a coin's true value before degrading the holder!

    If I recall correctly, had Pepperdoodles not inserted his last second snipe, you would have had that '65 SMS Cameo for like $15. Add in a grading fee and you would have had that coin for less than 1/3 of it's value. A nice bargain.

    Glad you shared the results with the Forum! image


    image
  • DCAMFranklinDCAMFranklin Posts: 2,862 ✭✭
    ttt


    image
  • merz2merz2 Posts: 2,474
    RGL
    I agree wholeheartily.The 1950 Proof Lincoln that I sent to PCGS came back PR65 DCAM.I bought it of Ebay for $75.It can be done.With some of the scans/pics it is very hard to tell sometimes.Sometimes it is just a feeling.I have been lucky.Sometimes not so lucky.It only takes one of these to make you feel real good.
    Don
    Registry 1909-1958 Proof Lincolns

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file