Home U.S. Coin Forum

*****Let's hear from the Bust guru's - how about some input*****

I recently purchased this 1837 R. E. 50c. For the purposes of this post I've only posted the reverse. This is a JR-12. Take note of the depressed circle located dead center (lower left area of the horizontal lines in the shield). This is clearly mint made and is a perfect circle. There is luster down in this depressed area as well as a raised die line in the lower left portion of this depressed area. Reiver concludes this to be an "incuse center dot" but personally I don't buy that. There is NOTHING on the obverse corresponding to this depressed area. I'm pretty sure center dots were not used on R. E. halves and this is one heck of a center dot in terms of size if in fact that's what it is. Any input is welcome and appreciated.

image

image

image

Edited to add requested obverse image
Mike Printz
Harlan J. Berk, Ltd.
https://hjbltd.com/#!/department/us-coins

Comments

  • blu62vetteblu62vette Posts: 11,951 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I have no ideas on this coin but great pics of a wonderful coin!!!
    http://www.bluccphotos.com" target="new">BluCC Photos Shows for onsite imaging: Nov Baltimore, FUN, Long Beach http://www.facebook.com/bluccphotos" target="new">BluCC on Facebook
  • firstmintfirstmint Posts: 1,171
    Here is a consensus opinion about those centering dots:

    They were created as a necessary compass point centering position to scribe the lines of the denticles at the outer rim. These "dots" can be found on both obverse and reverse dies (especially on the half dollars). Apparently, it was also used to help center the hub when creating the working dies. It may have even been created by part of the hub transfer process.

    These were not punched in on the planchet, thus, it didn't affect the opposite side in any way.

    The circular scribe lines can be seen on some of the uniface splashers and trial pieces made from different hubs and dies of the time period around the 1830s & 1840s.

    There are other articles about these in the numismatic literature such as the JR Journal, and the Wiley / Bugert book on Seated Half Dollars.


    PM me if you are looking for U.S. auction catalogs
  • lakeshorelakeshore Posts: 178 ✭✭
    firstmint -- All the centering dots I have seen result in a raised "point" on the coin, since the die itself had the depression. This beautiful coin looks to have an indented area on the coin; which would seemingly require a raised area on the working die -- wouldn't it?
  • TomBTomB Posts: 22,097 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I had seen images of this coin earlier and the first thought that came to mind was that something fell on the planchet that resulted in an unretained strikethrough. Of course, such a well-centered, perfectly round strikethrough is tough to accept.
    Thomas Bush Numismatics & Numismatic Photography

    In honor of the memory of Cpl. Michael E. Thompson

    image
  • firstmintfirstmint Posts: 1,171
    There are different "types" of centering "dots".

    There are the raised dots on the coins themselves, these are relatively plentiful, and found on various denominations. These are the "compass point" dots, which are smaller.

    Then there are the depression "dots" which are found mostly on Half Dollars. Wiley/Bugert write about this depression "dot" after an 1853 on page 104 of their excellent work - "Most tail dies have an interesting "hole" characteristic in the first set of three bars on the reverse die. This was most likely caused by a centering tool to accomplish reverse hub work and is similar in nature to the 1843 and 1844-O "compass point" head dies".

    I've seen a partial depression (actually a flat spot on the die surface) in the center of a raised centering circle on a few quarter eagles from the 1840's. The 1850 & 1858 QE plated in the Aker's volume has the depression centering dot (hole?) that is identical to the 1837 half in this thread. All of the details are missing inside the dot area.

    At this point, there is no Mint documentation to validate what actually caused these. It was most likely from a work-in-progress modification.
    PM me if you are looking for U.S. auction catalogs
  • slumlord98slumlord98 Posts: 1,180
    This is not my field of expertise but I'd guess that dot was made on the hub as mentioned by firstmint and not the working die. If this type was essentially fully hubbed then that would explain its use as a centering dot. On the lettered edge halves all the detail of the shield was added by hand which is why there are so many instances of the shield lines extending beyond the borders. The mint experimented with fully hubbed halves in 1834 on the 'abominable basterds', a term coined by the late Dr. Ivan Leaman, who did in depth studies of these in the 1970s. Perhaps by 1837 they were able to at least partially hub such detail which would reduce the effort and time required of finishing dies by hand and would give a more uniform appearance to the coins.

    A weakness with this explanation is that any other working dies made from this hub would also display this dot. If anyone has other high grade REs, check for evidence of refinishing at this spot.
  • LongacreLongacre Posts: 16,717 ✭✭✭
    Is the dot too large to be a centering dot? If used to hold a compass point, why would such a large dot be needed? I know the picture is blown up, but it looks too large for what it should be to me.

    Where is Kraljevich when we need him? image
    Always took candy from strangers
    Didn't wanna get me no trade
    Never want to be like papa
    Working for the boss every night and day
    --"Happy", by the Rolling Stones (1972)
  • FinallyHereFinallyHere Posts: 821 ✭✭✭
    Fristmint and Slumlord I truly appreciate the input. As Longacre points out, and as I stated in my OP, the size of this makes it hard to believe it's a "center dot" of some sort. It certainly makes sense, but it's quite large. The reason I posted the full reverse image was to illustrate size relative to the entire reverse. Thanks to all and any more input is greatly appreciated.
    Mike Printz
    Harlan J. Berk, Ltd.
    https://hjbltd.com/#!/department/us-coins
  • slumlord98slumlord98 Posts: 1,180
    Mike,

    It may also be an artifact of the lathe used to turn down the hub stock. This would explain its size.
  • LoveMyLibertyLoveMyLiberty Posts: 1,784 ✭✭✭
    Mike,

    If you aren't on vacation,,,could you provide us with the obverse image and the
    diameter size of your coin please.

    image
    My Type Set

    R.I.P. Bear image
  • jdillanejdillane Posts: 2,365 ✭✭✭
    Clearly, this represents nothing more than damage (probably a failed attempt at putting a hole in the coin) to what would otherwise have been a so-so coin. But, I will give you 2x melt for it! image
  • mhammermanmhammerman Posts: 3,769 ✭✭✭
    A very similar centering mark exists on some of the '52 and '53 lib eagles in about the same location.
  • BearBear Posts: 18,953 ✭✭✭
    Now can we see the obverse

    of what looks to be a great coin?
    There once was a place called
    Camelotimage
  • FinallyHereFinallyHere Posts: 821 ✭✭✭
    Okay Bear - the obverse image is posted.
    Mike Printz
    Harlan J. Berk, Ltd.
    https://hjbltd.com/#!/department/us-coins
  • rheddenrhedden Posts: 6,632 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I bet you could get a deal on one of these by claiming that someone started to drill a hole there... at least I know that's what I'd hear if I tried to sell one to a random dealer at a show!


    Edited to add: tongue-in-cheek comment, not meant to offend dealers.
  • BearBear Posts: 18,953 ✭✭✭
    Ahhhhhhhh, wundebar!image
    There once was a place called
    Camelotimage
  • NicNic Posts: 3,418 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Could we have some better pics Mike?

    K

    Almost forgot ....

    image

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file