Home World & Ancient Coins Forum

Coin reference in a 19th century Korean diary: 100-cash

My interest in collecting coins comes mainly from my studies in history. I found an interesting reference this evening to the Korean 100-cash coin and thought I would share it with you all. There reference comes from the diary of a 19th century Korean scholar, Pak Chudae. He lived in the countryside and was never a member of the government but he seems to have been well informed of the issues of his day. On a trip into Seoul in 1866/1867, he wrote the following in his journal:



The Lord Taewon distributed the following announcement, "In transactions of one yang or more, use 100-cash coins. In transactions of one yang or less, use leaf coins. As for those who do not obey this command, have the provincial governors and their officials first behead [the offender] and then report [the offense]." (Naam surok, p. 3-4)




The Lord Taewon (Taewongun) was the father of the king and the one who actually controlled the affairs of state. The 100-cash coin was the first multi-denominational coin put into circulation in Korea but since it was terribly debased, inflation was rampant and the coin was withdrawn from circulation a few months after minting began. One yang was equal to 100 "leaf coins" or the one-cash sangp'yong t'ongbo coins. The one-cash coins were called leaf coins because of their appearance as they first were taken from the mold, as Hamiltonj's post of a little while ago illustrated so well.


Maybe the US government should consider a similar policy for encouraging the use of the sacagawea dollar.







Comments

  • laurentyvanlaurentyvan Posts: 4,243 ✭✭✭
    Interesting bit of history.

    Most of the Asian peoples of that time seem to have had a predilection for beheading as one of the only punishments for just about any crime.

    Europeans were also fond of beheading and hanging, with the occasional loss of limb or eyes.

    Not politically correct, eh?image
    One of the penalties for refusing to participate in politics
    is that you end up being governed by inferiors. – Plato
  • Can I assume that Lord Taewon was the recipient of the seigniorage resulting from said debasement?image
    "It is good for the state that the people do not think."

    Adolf Hitler
  • As far as I can tell, no one refuses to accept them.
    It's just no one seems interested in them at all.
    I can still get rolls of them at the bank.
    The USPS is the only big customer for them though.
    Of course that method might be incentive for the vending machine people to adjsut their machines to accept them.

    Actually when I think about it, they should have made a 50 cent piece about the size of a Sac dollar and a larger coin for the dollar size.
    I think it would have gone over better.
    image
  • sumnomsumnom Posts: 5,963 ✭✭✭
    Big Alan,

    The Taewongun used the massive seignorage to pay for military expansion and extensive repairs on the main royal residence. He was indeed looking for new sources of revenue.
  • Maybe the US government should consider a similar policy for encouraging the use of the sacagawea dollar.

    The Sac and the $2 both suffer the same handicap, there's no place in a cash register for them.
    "It is good for the state that the people do not think."

    Adolf Hitler
  • sumnomsumnom Posts: 5,963 ✭✭✭
    I am sure that with the threat of summary decapitation, people might find a place in the register for them.
  • sumnomsumnom Posts: 5,963 ✭✭✭
    image

    I tried to find a good image of the coin inquestion here but this was the best I could get.
  • laurentyvanlaurentyvan Posts: 4,243 ✭✭✭
    Sumnom, where does this cast bronze piece fit in-would this 1836 piece be a precursor to the one under discussion?

    imageimage
    One of the penalties for refusing to participate in politics
    is that you end up being governed by inferiors. – Plato
  • sumnomsumnom Posts: 5,963 ✭✭✭
    The Kaesong piece in your scan is one of the "leaf coins," or one mun pieces that were to be used for transactions under one yang. Given how nice yours is, I bet it was still a part of a charm in 1866.
Sign In or Register to comment.