Search
-
THERE IS NOT ONE 1981 TOPPS REGULAR SET FERNANDO VALENZUELA PSA 10 BUT 3 1952 TOPPS PSA 10 MANTLES
-
Re: THERE IS NOT ONE 1981 TOPPS REGULAR SET FERNANDO VALENZUELA PSA 10 BUT 3 1952 TOPPS PSA 10 MANTLES
-
Re: THERE IS NOT ONE 1981 TOPPS REGULAR SET FERNANDO VALENZUELA PSA 10 BUT 3 1952 TOPPS PSA 10 MANTLES
-
Re: THERE IS NOT ONE 1981 TOPPS REGULAR SET FERNANDO VALENZUELA PSA 10 BUT 3 1952 TOPPS PSA 10 MANTLES
-
Re: THERE IS NOT ONE 1981 TOPPS REGULAR SET FERNANDO VALENZUELA PSA 10 BUT 3 1952 TOPPS PSA 10 MANTLES
If they ever graded one a 10 it would be closely scrutinized and hardly anyone would be happy with it. It would be a lose-lose situation for PSA. people need to remember that PSA 10 does not = perfect. look at the lone PSA 10 Thomas NNOF. it has noticeable and distracting ink smudging on the reverse. I have never talked to… -
Re: THERE IS NOT ONE 1981 TOPPS REGULAR SET FERNANDO VALENZUELA PSA 10 BUT 3 1952 TOPPS PSA 10 MANTLES
-
Re: THERE IS NOT ONE 1981 TOPPS REGULAR SET FERNANDO VALENZUELA PSA 10 BUT 3 1952 TOPPS PSA 10 MANTLES
-
Re: THERE IS NOT ONE 1981 TOPPS REGULAR SET FERNANDO VALENZUELA PSA 10 BUT 3 1952 TOPPS PSA 10 MANTLES
-
Re: THERE IS NOT ONE 1981 TOPPS REGULAR SET FERNANDO VALENZUELA PSA 10 BUT 3 1952 TOPPS PSA 10 MANTLES
-
Re: THERE IS NOT ONE 1981 TOPPS REGULAR SET FERNANDO VALENZUELA PSA 10 BUT 3 1952 TOPPS PSA 10 MANTLES
20 results