Search
-
Re: Peak Value vs. Career Value
<< <i> Player #1: 10,000 AB, 3,000 Hits, 400 2B, 100 3B, 300 HR, 1,000 BB, 1,200 Runs, 1,500 RBI, 125 OPS+, 100 SB, 30 CS. Player #2: 10,000 AB, 3,000 Hits, 400 2B, 100 3B, 300 HR, 1,000 BB, 1,200 Runs, 1,500 RBI, 125 OPS+, 100 SB, 30 CS. Which one was better? Which one deserves to be in the HOF? >> Crazy how these two… -
Peak Value vs. Career Value
In the HOF Standards thread I ranked everyone by weighting their peak value very high and their career value (when they "accumulate") very low. This produces rankings that I think are pretty good, with one or two exceptions, provided the foundation of the system - that peak value counts most of all - is accepted. But I'm… -
Re: Peak Value vs. Career Value
<< <i>When it comes to baseball analysis, people often use 'opinion' inappropriately, i.e they opine what they believe the value of a BB, 1B, 2B HR, etc..are, when in reality those aren't opinion based. Their values are their values, and baseball's linear nature allows valid measurements to show that quite easily. However,… -
Re: Peak Value vs. Career Value
<< <i> << <i>When it comes to baseball analysis, people often use 'opinion' inappropriately, i.e they opine what they believe the value of a BB, 1B, 2B HR, etc..are, when in reality those aren't opinion based. Their values are their values, and baseball's linear nature allows valid measurements to show that quite easily.… -
Re: Peak Value vs. Career Value
<< <i>Fair enough, skin, that example wasn't what I was picturing but now that I see it spelled out in detail, I see what you're saying. The example I had in mind was more like this (using a 10 year career, just for simplicity): Pitcher A: 26, 25, 24, 19, 17, 15, 13, 8, 7, 6 (160 total) Pitcher B: 16, 16, 16, 16, 16, 16,…
5 results