Search
-
Re: 1985fan is dead wrong about the term Redskin
I read that article above. That study they were highlighting seemed much filled with validity problems. They did nothing to show that it wasn't a slur, and when they pointed out that Indians calling Indians each other the name is different than when a non Indian calls them...it still shows it is disrespectful. But forget… -
Re: 1985fan is dead wrong about the term Redskin
<< <i>It was brought up to refute the (false) notion that the Redskins team is a private company. >> Did you not just read my other post. The only team that isn't a privately held company are the Packers. The only tie they have to the NFL (a not-for-profit trade association that benefits from a tax-exempt status) is… -
Re: 1985fan is dead wrong about the term Redskin
Walking around this afternoon to vote and I saw the signs indicating the place to vote, and the signs were in both English and Spanish, and it brought me back to this discussion. The same folks who rail against signs/voice mails being in both English and Spanish are likely the same folks railing against a minority of… -
Re: 1985fan is dead wrong about the term Redskin
<< <i>This discussion is no different. >> Oh I would say it's a little different << <i>As far as this nonsense of it being a 'private' company, you really should educate yourself before you go spewing that around any further. The NFL enjoys tax exempt status - why do you think people fall all over themselves to secure an… -
Re: 1985fan is dead wrong about the term Redskin
<< <i>Walking around this afternoon to vote and I saw the signs indicating the place to vote, and the signs were in both English and Spanish, and it brought me back to this discussion. The same folks who rail against signs/voice mails being in both English and Spanish are likely the same folks railing against a minority of…
5 results