Search

1. Re: Which is rarer regarding the so-called 1893/2 10c?

   

   

   Comment by RichieURich · May 28, 2012 1:42PM · Home› U.S. Coin Forum

   << <i> << <i>The proof is rarer, but both are very tough. Disclosure note: I have a proof and two business strikes. I've thought this issue has been underrated for a long time. >> Rich, where is it written that the proof is rarer, just would like the source documentation that is all, not questioning your beliefs. >> I…

2. Re: Which is rarer regarding the so-called 1893/2 10c?

   

   Comment by tincup · May 28, 2012 12:21PM · Home› U.S. Coin Forum

   Does PCGS or NGC recognize the variety? I do have what appears to be a nice proof 1893/2 in a PCGS PF62 holder, but the variety is not identified (though it is an older slab). The underlying 2 is quite clear. It seems that there are not many pictures around for the proof variety.

3. Re: Which is rarer regarding the so-called 1893/2 10c?

   

   Comment by LanceNewmanOCC · May 28, 2012 3:52PM · Home› U.S. Coin Forum

   << <i>and here is a close up of a business strike so-called 1893/2 >> niiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiice don't suppose you have a plain ol 2 for comparison? what does pcgs call that 1848 btw. i didn't follow that thread after my inquisition of the 1 and first 8 also having some re-punching going on? edited for accurating quoting

4. Re: Which is rarer regarding the so-called 1893/2 10c?

   

   Comment by unknown · May 28, 2012 4:17PM · Home› U.S. Coin Forum

   This content has been removed.

5. Re: Which is rarer regarding the so-called 1893/2 10c?

   

   Comment by DIMEMAN · May 28, 2012 12:27PM · Home› U.S. Coin Forum

   The 1893/2 is in the PCGS Registry sets.

6. Re: Which is rarer regarding the so-called 1893/2 10c?

   

   Comment by unknown · May 28, 2012 2:26PM · Home› U.S. Coin Forum

   This content has been removed.

7. Re: Which is rarer regarding the so-called 1893/2 10c?

   

   Comment by CircOnly · May 28, 2012 12:10PM · Home› U.S. Coin Forum

   1893/2 10C Anyone have a picture of that? Never seen an over date Barber 10C. Or any other barber for that matter.

8. Re: Which is rarer regarding the so-called 1893/2 10c?

   

   Comment by unknown · May 28, 2012 1:07PM · Home› U.S. Coin Forum

   This content has been removed.

9. Re: Which is rarer regarding the so-called 1893/2 10c?

   

   

   Comment by LanceNewmanOCC · May 28, 2012 1:55PM · Home› U.S. Coin Forum

   << <i>I agree the line in the 3 is a stretch in one's mind to call it a definitive 2 underdate imho, but then i typically disagree on just about anything that is discussed here >> maybe someone could get a high-grade and/or EDS version to MG like this one we discussed previously. the following is not my coin: