Search

1. Re: NT R AT?

   

   

   Comment by kurtdog · July 4, 2010 1:39AM · Home› U.S. Coin Forum

   << <i>I read it and am not weeping. LOL. Then again the same person said twice in recent times that dipping ASEs in acetone will prevent formation of milk spots which I'm pretty sure is untrue. The same person he quotes told me that the dip is Ezest. >> Some people are dips, themselves.

2. Re: NT R AT?

   

   Comment by BAJJERFAN · July 3, 2010 5:12AM · Home› U.S. Coin Forum

   << <i> << <i>BAJJERFAN: "If it is "not that difficult" to duplicate then why don't we see better dates like the 86-o 89-o 91-o 92-o 97-o with similar toning? If one is THAT good at it, then a pricier coin like a ms63 1897-o should be a low risk endeavor, no? Even the common date 1888-o doesn't afford a plethora of nicely…

3. Re: NT R AT?

   

   Comment by Griv · July 4, 2010 1:08AM · Home› U.S. Coin Forum

   I discovered how to remove the milky spots without ANY damage to the coin. Even from MS/PR70 coins with zero damage and zero change to the original luster.

4. Re: NT R AT?

   

   

   Comment by Griv · July 7, 2010 11:42AM · Home› U.S. Coin Forum

   << <i>I discovered how to remove the milky spots without ANY damage to the coin. Even from MS/PR70 coins with zero damage and zero change to the original luster. >> It'll also remove NT toning from Morgans. It won't remove AT toning which is exactly opposite of what I'd want. If you want to test if the toning is legit you…