Search
-
Re: If we're going to put Bill Mazeroski in the HOF, shouldn't Jim Kaat be in also (for the same reasons
<< <i>I will say I was VERY surprised when Kirby Puckett got in on the first ballot; even though his stats are similar to Don's. Though Kirby does have those two shiny rings... Ryne Sandberg's stats are even more similar still to Don's (including matching Don's nine gold gloves and MVP), yet he's in and Don is not. >>… -
Re: If we're going to put Bill Mazeroski in the HOF, shouldn't Jim Kaat be in also (for the same reasons
To say Mazeroski is the worst HOF selection is truly idiotic. The cronies of the Frisch regime were much worse. Lloyd Waner was a much worse selection from the same team. I think alot of people sort of remember Mazeroski play or at least seen him alive so it's much easier to say he was the worst rather than some guy who… -
If we're going to put Bill Mazeroski in the HOF, shouldn't Jim Kaat be in also (for the same reasons
I know Mr. Mazeroski gets all the attention based off his World Series winning tater in the 1960 World Series. But he was never even close to getting into the HOF (let's just say his career stats line doesn't exactly scream first ballot) until some of his peers realized that he was the greatest fielding 2B at least of his… -
Re: If we're going to put Bill Mazeroski in the HOF, shouldn't Jim Kaat be in also (for the same reasons
<< <i>Just at second base alone I'd rather have Maz than the following: Red Schoendienst Johnny Evers and maybe Nellie Fox though he has good longevity so probably not him >> Who belongs in the HOF is always going to be subjective, and I won't disagree with you that there are sound arguments to be made for keeping all of…
4 results