Search

1. Re: Interesting post about SEGS

   

   Comment by unknown · February 9, 2008 11:31AM · Home› U.S. Coin Forum

   This content has been removed.

2. Re: Interesting post about SEGS

   

   Comment by unknown · February 10, 2008 9:12AM · Home› U.S. Coin Forum

   This content has been removed.

3. Re: Interesting post about SEGS

   

   Comment by Russ · February 9, 2008 8:09AM · Home› U.S. Coin Forum

   << <i>Secondly, most coins going to NgC are those that aren't sent to PCGS >> Gee, that's profound. Russ, NCNE

4. Re: Interesting post about SEGS

   

   

   Comment by Russ · February 10, 2008 5:44AM · Home› U.S. Coin Forum

   Hey Realone, How about you grow up and stop sending me childish eMails through the eBay system? Russ, NCNE

5. Re: Interesting post about SEGS

   

   

   Comment by Russ · February 9, 2008 8:04AM · Home› U.S. Coin Forum

   << <i>My first purchase from a neighborhood dealer who I expressly stated that I would like to invest in a top quality classic coin. He showed me a SEGS AU55 that also stated slight rough surfaces. I trusted the dealer, paid $2k and thought that it was a great investment. >> So, it's SEGS' fault that the dealer is a…

6. Re: Interesting post about SEGS

   

   Comment by Russ · February 9, 2008 8:07AM · Home› U.S. Coin Forum

   << <i>Later as I became experienced I learned that SEGS net grades without really saying so >> Every service, PCGS and NGC included, does that. And, what exactly did you think the term "rough surfaces" on the label meant? Your experience was born of a collision between your own ignorance and a less than reputable dealer.…