Search
-
Re: Need help from the morgan pro's, 1881 S

<< <i>Ahhh Russ, so sure of himself yet often mistaken about matters of toning. The same Russ that slammed a roll of Kennedy halves in one thread and then changed his mind to being 90% certain about their NT nature in another once they were in-hand...... >> If you think that shade of purple is natural on Morgans, I'll be… -
Re: Need help from the morgan pro's, 1881 S
Prooflike 1881-S Morgans are very common, and that one is artificially toned. Ahhh Russ, so sure of himself yet often mistaken about matters of toning. The same Russ that slammed a roll of Kennedy halves in one thread and then changed his mind to being 90% certain about their NT nature in another once they were… -
Re: Need help from the morgan pro's, 1881 S
<< <i>Sheesh, a wee touchy Russ? >> Touchy? Nope. I simply provided the response you asked for with your lame comments. << <i>Hence, my ideas that it is CLEARLY evident to most. >> It became evident to you after he posted that it was lighting. Before that, you didn't have a clue. << <i>Even with the Kennedys in-hand, you… -
Re: Need help from the morgan pro's, 1881 S
-
Re: Need help from the morgan pro's, 1881 S
-
Re: Need help from the morgan pro's, 1881 S

Sheesh, a wee touchy Russ? I think that most would agree from the pics (even BEFORE we were subsequently told) that the lighting is strange. Hence, my ideas that it is CLEARLY evident to most. Even with the Kennedys in-hand, you were 90% sure. That's kind of like being 90% pregnant. Not much of a stance on anything. But I… -
Re: Need help from the morgan pro's, 1881 S

Russ, why not just admit that you jumped in a bit too soon with your AT comment? Yes, the lighting on the pics looks weird. Seriously, you can't tell that? I know you wish that I wasn't thinking this way before we were told that the lighting is weird, but I really do think that MOST people (not you) would look at those…
7 results