Search
-
$10 1853/2; $20 1853 repunced date
Hi - I dont have the references but hope someone would check to see if there's any mention of these die states. I have a $10 1853, which appears to be repunched - the 3 just slightly west. Ill try to attach an image. There's a visible underdate 2, it seems to me, but its not in the place usually seen on certified 1853/2… -
Re: $10 1853/2; $20 1853 repunced date

Breen 7159 - 1853 Obviously Repunched 1, repunching plainest at base Breen 7160 - 1853 Obviously Repucnhed 3, Plain extra outlines left of inner curve of 3 Breen 7161 - 1853 Blundered Date, base of 3 between 53, a little above bases. Base of extra 1 below and left of 1. Evidently began as a double date first slanting up… -
Re: $10 1853/2; $20 1853 repunced date
<< <i> << <i> << <i>QDB and many others doubt the 1853/2. >> This variety is recognized by all the major grading services, the red book, the grey sheet, etc. >> >> There are many, many folks who doubt whether the 1853/2 $20 is a true overdate, and not just a repunched date. But you are correct. The grading services and… -
Re: $10 1853/2; $20 1853 repunced date
-
Re: $10 1853/2; $20 1853 repunced date
-
Re: $10 1853/2; $20 1853 repunced date
Its possible as to the 3. The five and the 1 appear to be repunched northwest and north, respectively, though, from a latitude about the same as this underdate 2 I think Im seeing here. Its hard to say as to the 8 but it looks to me like this is basically an 1853/1852 - what Im wondering is, is such a thing known in the… -
Re: $10 1853/2; $20 1853 repunced date
-
Re: $10 1853/2; $20 1853 repunced date
-
Re: $10 1853/2; $20 1853 repunced date
-
Re: $10 1853/2; $20 1853 repunced date
The 1853 $20 right now is in an NGC AU 55 holder. It is, to be honest, um, perhaps a bit less attractive than what one might wish. But it looks to me to be technically MS, but weakly struck and covered with bagmarks, plus this blurry weirdness about the date. Id send it to PCGS and try to cross it over, but Id like it to…
18 results

