Search
-
Re: NGC being sued over "first strike" designation
<< <i>It'll likely be a tough case against NGC because it clearly and continuously published the meaning of "First Strike" as it uses the designation. Not everybody has that defense. >> The law typically uses a "reasonable person" scenario. What will a reasonable person think "First Strike" means. As for continual… -
Re: NGC being sued over "first strike" designation
<< <i>NGC may have a defense in that their labels are plurual -- FIRST STRIKES. This clearly indicates a deviation from the traditional definition and since they have always had their definition posted, consumers don't have much of an excuse for falling for the marketing ploy. >> I don't think making it plural gets them…
2 results