Search
-
Re: Hey, why not a "Keets" hypothetical???
<< <i><< Is the seller under any obligation to accept a return?? Has the seller deceived the bidders?? >> No, and no. Russ, NCNE >> Russ - Don't you list a lost of coins without showing the holder? >> Most of my listings don't include the holder. I'd rather use the space showing the coin than the plastic. But, unlike this… -
Re: Hey, why not a "Keets" hypothetical???
<< <i> << <i>Is the seller under any obligation to accept a return?? Has the seller deceived the bidders?? >> No, and no. Russ, NCNE >> Russ - Don't you list a lost of coins without showing the holder? -
Re: Hey, why not a "Keets" hypothetical???
<< <i>Is the seller under any obligation to accept a return?? Has the seller deceived the bidders?? >> No, and no. Russ, NCNE -
Re: Hey, why not a "Keets" hypothetical???
<< <i>It sounds to me like deception by omission..... >> Only of one thinks the plastic is more important than the coin. Assuming that in Keets' scenario the seller provided large clear images and accurately described the condition of the coin, the bidder has no beef. Russ, NCNE -
Re: Hey, why not a "Keets" hypothetical???
I usually agree with Mark, but this time I do not. What if the seller cracked the coin out and sold it raw? Would he have an obligation to disclose that it once was in a 62 holder? What if it were raw and the seller bought it as a 62 from a dealer who is known as a world class grader, would he have to disclose the grade at… -
Re: Hey, why not a "Keets" hypothetical???
<< <i>I usually agree with Mark, but this time I do not. What if the seller cracked the coin out and sold it raw? Would he have an obligation to disclose that it once was in a 62 holder? What if it were raw and the seller bought it as a 62 from a dealer who is known as a world class grader, would he have to disclose the…
6 results