Search
-
The truth of 1888 Snow-2
In the attached short report, I work through the issues brought by Tim Larson MD. I believe it proves to be a valid overdate. https://scientific-certifications-1888-i.shorthandstories.com/the-truth-of-1888-snow-2/index.html -
Re: The truth of 1888 Snow-2
The critical assumptions of Rick Snow, Chris Pilliod, and Dr. Larson that were that the 8 was directly over the 7, and the underdate 3rd 8 was struck fully. If anyone believed those 2 things, they would have to conclude it was not an overdate. -
Re: The truth of 1888 Snow-2
Thanks for the fun memories! I enjoyed writing the article. Sorry to have missed Chris's analysis at the show in 2006. I'm not seeing illustrations in the 1st link. In the market news in that Longacres Ledger, there was mention of 2 major coins I bought. The 1886 was a Pop. 0 coin as the Ty2 wasn't mentioned on the label!… -
Re: The truth of 1888 Snow-2
Rick Snow spends several paragraphs in his 2014 book discussing this coin, Larson's article, and additional theories put forth after the 2006 presentation. He also provides some good overlay pictures. He concludes that while the overdate is plausible, it is not conclusive. He therefore errs on the side of caution and calls… -
Re: The truth of 1888 Snow-2
Dr. Larsons are in quotes. His analysis is on page 10 https://ia800804.us.archive.org/28/items/LLVol10No02Whole44Jun2000/LLVol10No02Whole44Jun2000.pdf -
Re: The truth of 1888 Snow-2
The S-1 has been more controversial, IIRC. This one seems less so. -
Re: The truth of 1888 Snow-2
Please clarify which opinions are yours and which opinions are Dr. Larson's. -
Re: The truth of 1888 Snow-2
Einstein quotes in sig files are a sign! -
Re: The truth of 1888 Snow-2
Thank you. This is much clearer. Now I remember the article. At the time, I thought that he was probably right. I still do.
11 results