Search
-
Re: My proof buffalo story
The second coin is superior. The central obverse is significantly stronger. Compare the hair knots and areas just above them. That isn't a lighting discrepancy; the PCGS is simply hammered better. The milk spots (or whatever) in the reverse fields of the former ICG piece also detract slightly to my eye. -
Re: Franklin Grading Contest-PCGS Frankie Prize***Winners Announced***
-
Re: PR69 - PR70, When to Submit?
-
Should I acetone this 1936 Proof Lincoln?

I recently bought a raw 1936 proof lincoln off ebay -- and I am wondering if I should acetone the coin before submitting it for grading. I have no idea if PCGS will grade this coin as is, or if it's already destined to be a "Genuine" coin. The reason I am thinking about acetoning this is the coin has some obvious… -
Re: black spots on modern proofs
<< <i> << <i>I guess a dip of some kind would be best. search "spots" or "dip" on the forum. maybe other members will chime in on the topic but i'll bump it for ya. >> Would a dip, of any type, basically ruin a proof coin? I've never even open a plastic container that a proof comes in from the Mint. I'm just thinking out… -
Re: Help with this 1879-S Morgan dollar
Well I tell ya right now the coin has not been whizzed. If it was then whom ever whizzed it was a surgeon because these lines stop right at the high points of the coin wit pinpoint accuracy. They do not cross the lettering, the portrait, the date, the feathers nada. As I said they run cris-cross under the high points. What… -
2006 20th Anniversary Silver American Eagle 3 coin set NGC69 $330 shipped.
-
Re: What is the best way to store SAE's?
-
Re: Acetone question
-
Re: PSA 8's and 9's for Johnny Bench set builders
>6802 results


