Search
-
Re: Attention 69'ers - How do we feel about this?
For what it's worth (and my opinion isn't often worth much of anything!!), I would say that the sets should be compared in the same place. It seems to me to be a little off-kilter to have two different Registry listings for 1969 Topps. I wouldn't have to click one place to see how many people have completed the 664 card… -
Re: The next Eliasberg?
Could be true. If 4461 is the true list, 99% would be short of this by 45 coins. I can see getting all but 20 of the business strike coins, over many years. Getting all but 20 of the proofs would be really hard, though. The answer for a % depends a lot on what exactly the list is. Is it the current list in the PCGS… -
Re: Set Registry Question?
The weighting means that's how much the coin counts relative to other coins. So for example, if your set has a MS 62 with a weight of 1, then that counts as having one MS 62 in your set. If the set has a MS62 with a weight of 8, then that counts as 8 MS62s. In other words the number of coins in a set for Registry scoring… -
1969 & 1965 Boston Red Sox Team sets now live on the registry
-
On The "Weight" Of A Card
In the midst of upgrading my 1963 Topps Baseball set I have noticed that the prices of some commons in PSA 8 that have little weight are being offered or sold at ridiculous prices. Why would a buyer pay so much for a card that adds so little weight to their set. I can see adding a Hall Of Famer as that will raise your… -
Re: PSA sets with 10.0+ GPA
<< <i>Can anybody provide any insight as to why there are sets on the Registry with a 10.0+ GPA? >> No logic to it. If your scale is from 1 - 10, it doesn't make sense for a set to have a GPA above 10. Getting the weights in line would have made more sense. On master sets completion % should carry more weight than one… -
My response to PCGS Registry survey
I thought I'd share my response to Mr. Hall. I hoped that by doing so, the board might give me some feedback on the feasibility of my positions: January 8, 2002 Dear Mr. Hall, It was a pleasure and pleasant surprise to receive your survey eliciting feedback regarding the Registry. The Registry has added a new dimension to… -
Re: Questions .... and answers.... concerning PCGS Secure Plus
H i Don, I think I know this answer , but please confirm for me. If I have a 1921 ms66 peace dollar which has a "weight" in the PCGS Registry of 6 and that particular coin receives the +, making it MS66+, does that mean that the coin will now receive 3 points in the Registry ????, or would it only receive an actual half… -
Re: 1952 Topps Baseball MASTER SET new criteria
Ron, I'm with you. I have been hearing arguments to the contrary, however, in that a couple of other late '50s Topps baseball sets do also include a "gray back" series. I know nothing about any set OTHER than this '52T set, so I take their word for it. To me, this variation is more about the darned cardboard stock that was… -
Re: Grandfather's Collection; 80 years of Collecting Morgans, Need help!
>2021 results