yosclimber ✭✭✭✭✭
Reactions
-
Re: The Fugio Cent Thread
9-T is my best effort, but confidence is not very high. The Ornament looks like LEU, which narrows it down to Obv. 8 or 9. I1 does not look high, so that yields Obv 9. Since I can't read the WE ARE O… (View Post)2 -
Re: Counting denticles. Has this been done much for die pairs and identification?
I agree, die cracks are the best die marker for 3CN. 3CN is a relatively modern series with no mint mark, so the primary marker on an undamaged die is only the date position (and sometimes some hub d… (View Post)5 -
Re: Counting denticles. Has this been done much for die pairs and identification?
The denticle count is used for capped bust half dimes in the classic Logan-McCloskey book. I have used it to attribute some low grade half dimes where some of the normal die markers were not visible. (View Post)4 -
Re: 1875 twenty cent piece die pairing, BF-2 or BF-3?
This is the BF-3 date position. There are relatively few known, because it is a more recent discovery, after the first version of the attribution guide was published. So not that many people checked … (View Post)3 -
Re: The Fugio Cent Thread
I updated Dennis Rynes' 1983 attribution table to add the 4 newer die pairs and sort it by the 15 PCGS Registry set types. I left out the 4 "New Haven Restrike" items from the Registry set,… (View Post)4