yosclimber ✭✭✭✭✭

Thanks. The "1796" is roughly the same counterfeit die pair that we discussed in a thread last week. The fake in last week's thread had simulated wear and damage and was in a real PCGS… (View Post)

Yes. I have separate PDFs for 30 of the 67 date x mint marks on my web page: https://sites.google.com/view/clintcummins/half-dime-attribution-guide Each variety or major die state has a separate page… (View Post)

Certainly PCGS would not want to have a provably counterfeit coin in a genuine PCGS holder, out in the marketplace. Mistakes happen, and this was a tricky one. I expect they would be happy to learn f… (View Post)

Thank you for sharing the history of the coin and your thoughts on the issues raised here. I do not agree that "The coin is too worn to accurately attribute". It is not hard to see the posi… (View Post)

The seller is also a forum member, was tagged in this thread last night, and logged in to the forum today. So they may already have looked at this thread. Hopefully they will share their thoughts. (View Post)