realeswatcher ✭✭✭✭

Unless it was some blatantly overlooked MAJOR error (i.e., legend misspelling, 1748 dead king reverse, etc)... no minor variety would be worth ANYWHERE NEAR this anomalous price. If two bidders think… (View Post)

I kind of see it that if not for the blatantly false stamps, the host would qualify as absolutely typical (if a bit worn) for the type. threefifty, great piece, will study it more closely. Please sho… (View Post)

So obviously, the assayer is an oopsie-poopsie - but what about when there's NOT a simple tell? Roman, you scour eBay pretty often... Isn't it amazing how these "typical" last ~25 years or … (View Post)

The 1761 could 55 or even 58 based on eye appeal benefit of the doubt. That 1765 is overgraded at 53. (View Post)

Every one I've seen is awful: (View Post)