-
Re: Somebody scored.
And that 1822 they sold is an O-103 R5, probably worth 4x that much. By the way, some of you are absolutely delusional if you think that a buyer wouldn't have a strong case against a 3rd party for to… (View Post)1 -
Re: Somebody scored.
My friend, you're making a strawman argument based on your strong feelings about such things. Tortious interference is real, though I'm not sure that's ever been tested with online auctions, I sure w… (View Post)3 -
Re: Somebody scored.
The person most at risk for litigation in this case isn't the seller, but the 3rd party who no doubt contacted him after the sale. Some of you do-gooders don't realize the possible consequences of yo… (View Post)2 -
Re: Somebody scored.
Agreed...the seller's worst case scenario is a neg. (View Post)3 -
Re: So do you like the new forum better than the last one?
The eye appeal is terrible, honestly. The solid white color with no delineation has got to go. (View Post)4
