-
Re: Recent Vintage Submission POP - A kick in the b@ll5!
I’ve been following this thread but until now have held off from responding because it would totally be the “old man shakes fist at cloud” meme. But here goes. In the early 2000s, I built both a 72T … (View Post)7 -
Re: My. . .it's been a VERY long time.
@1954 I did some thinking about this and the best way I can describe it is this. . . When I was submitting back in the day, there were some pretty clear delineations between a 7, an 8, and a 9. And i… (View Post)3 -
Re: PSA 9oc to SGC 6
Nice looking card, but to my eye the centering is off enough to be borderline miscut. Even for a 7 you can be no worse than 70/30 - and it looks to be well outside that. I think a 9OC was your best p… (View Post)2 -
Re: My. . .it's been a VERY long time.
@1954 A few things at play here. * Back in the day (2002-2005), grading was in the range of $6-$8. So if you were encouraged to submit stuff that was close. Because if it was a grade off, it was disa… (View Post)1 -
Re: Opinions for a new collector
I’ll generally disagree with @bgr. I also come at this from a different angle. In the early 2000s I built graded sets of 72T & 75T (both baseball) with every card in PSA8 or better. I sold both o… (View Post)3