-
Re: 1894 S NGC to PCGS *Crack out*
In my experience, most Lincolns and Morgans in those holders are 1 pt overgraded to PCGS standards. (View Post)1 -
Re: Building a Lincoln Wheat Registry Basic Set (1909-1958)
Not to derail the OP thread with this the Q&A, but I am a 40 year RD and RB copper collector and have never had a coin "turn" on me and I do nothing special with my slabs. No offense or… (View Post)2 -
Re: Why would anyone avoid a Plus coin?
Did they change this? It used to say "top 10%" when it first came out IIRC. The + % still averages 2%. I understand not all grades are eligible but it's still way less than 30%. Am I wrong … (View Post)1 -
Re: Post Your PCGS Toned Lincolns!
Nice coin! That is an understatement. '36 satin proof extremely tough to find in high grades that are nice, period. With color is a feat... (View Post)1 -
Re: OK Heather - why was the 1922 No D weak reverse deleted from the Lincoln sets ????
As much as I appreciate the answer, I don't understand the conclusion. I have seen many No D weak reverses that have no trace of a D whatsoever. (View Post)5
