-
Re: The 1917 Matte Proof Lincoln: Fact or Fiction?
Tom, Because it is certified as a 1917 matte proof, does not absolutely imply that it is such. Do you believe everything you see on a slab? Haven't you found coins in slabs that were not what they cl… (View Post)2 -
Re: The 1917 Matte Proof Lincoln: Fact or Fiction?
So IMO, Breen was then considered an "expert" because IMO no one then challenged him. IMO, if Roger, JD, or a few others were back then, we would have refuted Breen then, and perhaps he wou… (View Post)2 -
Re: 1942-S "Frith" Nickel, Reverse of 1941.
There is one low grade specimen of a 1942-S Jefferson nickel that is claimed to have been struck on a copper-nickel planchet with the S mint mark on the side of Monticello. This was claimed to have b… (View Post)1 -
Re: Good Intentions, Unexpected Side Effects, on a Police Wanted Post for using a “Counterfeit $10 bill”
You are right in general, I agree with your point, anyone with experience and knowledge should be able to identify counterfeit currency. Perhaps it is specific to the legal perspective, such as a pol… (View Post)1 -
Re: Good Intentions, Unexpected Side Effects, on a Police Wanted Post for using a “Counterfeit $10 bill”
OMG, LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL, rolling on the floor laughing (View Post)1