david3142 ✭✭✭✭✭
Reactions
-
Re: Has anyone noticed that NGC photo department has improved immensely?
The old scans and the new PhotoVision are not the same type of photography service. I believe PhotoVision is an add-on, although perhaps it is also included in certain types of grading like the TrueV… (View Post)1 -
Re: This coin blows my mind
I don’t believe that’s true. It also doesn’t make sense from a guarantee perspective. Compare a typical common date against a 92-S or 93-S in the same grade. The key dates will very likely be nicer. … (View Post)1 -
Re: How would you spell "slabable?"
Seems like English convention would dictate “slabbable”. I see grabbable seems to be the correct spelling of that word so that’s consistent. (View Post)4 -
Re: Is this 1921 Morgan worth submitting to PCGS for grading? Possibly proof-like...
If you think it’s got a good shot, go for it. That coin looks better than 63 to me. 1921 Morgans seem to be graded more leniently for some reason. They are tough on PL though, but a 63PL is a $500 co… (View Post)2 -
Re: 1880-S GTG "Revealed"
I’ll guess 64. I think the reverse misses PL but it’s hard to tell with the lighting. The obverse looks easily PL though. (View Post)1