breakdown ✭✭✭✭✭

Positives: strong reverse strike for a tough date. Possibly good luster (first set of photos is overexposed. Second doesn't capture luster very well). Negatives: first set of photos shows two pa… (View Post)

55 65 15 (View Post)

Now that you’ve posted the coin, I have to say it looked undergraded in Dan’s inventory and now also in Robec’s photos. The luster may be a bit understated but the coin is from 1842, and it appears v… (View Post)

Saw it in Dan’s inventory I think so I won’t “guess.” Great looking coin - you are putting together a very nice set of seated halves. (View Post)

* I try to always guess before looking at others’ grades. Luster grazes in the face are unfortunate. (View Post)