WinLoseWin ✭✭✭✭✭

Does not look whizzed or altered to me, just heavy die use. I suspect the unusually mark free surfaces and heavy die wear flow lines are throwing some people off. If you think it could get a 67 then … (View Post)

MS-66+ (View Post)

. . Not looking good for the coin in the OP. Circulation marks cannot appear on other coins in the same identical place. That seems to be how some of the more deceptive counterfeits of various series… (View Post)

Coins often look various ways in different lighting and angles. That is why we ususally move them around when viewing. Short of a video, it's why I usually take two or more types of lighting ang… (View Post)

Yes, it is now confirmed as the Eliasberg coin. By the "maybe one inconclusive item" mentioned in my April 20 post above, I was referring to the possible angled mark below Liberty's ch… (View Post)