-
Re: Counting denticles. Has this been done much for die pairs and identification?
That's some amazing work @yosclimber . I know it's a higher mintage year, but I never would have guessed so many pairings existed for just that one date. Interesting that you found a second 1866 proo… (View Post)4 -
Re: I Just Had This Thing Crossed and Upgraded at CACG, Now apparently a Pop 1
Agreed, we all had some fun and a laugh. To bring it back to the coin, here it is imaged by CAC. I hope op doesn't mind me posting. Congrats on a very nice coin. (View Post)6 -
Re: Counting denticles. Has this been done much for die pairs and identification?
I think it's always good to focus on another aspect when identifying die pairings. Allan Gifford wrote an extremely thorough book analyzing the die pairings and states of three cent nickels. His book… (View Post)4 -
Re: Post a coin, token, or medal with a "Mechanical Error"
I don't have one, but @PeakRarities beaver came to mind. I was unaware until his post that O.T. for Oregon Territory was mistakenly struck as T.O. (View Post)1 -
Re: CACG Market Status Observations
If the holder doesn't matter, why doesn't CAC sticker or consider a cross of any ANACS or ICG coins to CACG? (View Post)1
