TrickleCharge ✭✭✭✭

It's an 'altered' date, but probably not intentionally. Wear and corrosion, plus some random damage in just the right spot probably lead the submitter to believe it was an 1885 and the… (View Post)

Any update on the announcement or if there is any plan to fix the auction list sorting glitch? For those interested, NGC has a similar auction sales list. In my experience the PCGS one is more comple… (View Post)

In the high magnification image there appear to be some very small raised pimples from the transfer process and perhaps some tooling (although it's hard to tell looking at just the image). They … (View Post)

Likely an 1865, but clearly not an 1885. Don't focus on the damaged third digit. The giveaway is that the date punches used for 1885 were much larger than those used on this coin. Compare a genu… (View Post)

I don't know how common it is, but here is a copper nickel cent with a similar appearance. (View Post)