-
Re: Julian Edelman vs Barry Bonds
Also, it is said Bonds used starting in 1998 or 1999...but it wasn't until 2001 where his stats took a leap. So what took so long? Also, Craig, if I may....what if he started working out and lifting … (View Post)1 -
Re: Julian Edelman vs Barry Bonds
Whether it was legal or not doesn't discard the fact that it gave an unnatural competitive advantage. Isn't that the bottom line?? So it is back to: Anyone who is a Steeler fan of those teams must ei… (View Post)1 -
Re: Julian Edelman vs Barry Bonds
And that is what it comes down to. The moment someones hero is surpassed, then anger comes in. When your childhood era is no loner the cream of the crop, then emotions get in the way. (View Post)2 -
Re: Julian Edelman vs Barry Bonds
Seems fans have the same double standard too, based on this thread. If their is disdain for Bonds, then the same disdain should be laid upon all others who did the same. The mid-1970s Steelers were a… (View Post)1 -
Re: Belichick would have 2 less rings without Brady.
Belichik was a head coach without Brady and he had zero rings and a crummy record. He was 36-44 as head coach in Cleveland. In 2000 before Brady, the Patriots were 5-11. In 2001, before Brady they we… (View Post)4