-
Re: Another beauty from 1792
It absolutely, 100% guaranteed, is not 1792. Here is the logic: * Let us begin with observation. What does the date actually say? Despite your protestations, it does not clearly say anything, it is t… (View Post)9 -
Re: Anyone seen this? ('collector sealed' coins)
"Collector sealed" literally means nothing. Are you a coin collector? If so, you can go down to your local megastore and buy yourself one of those heat-sealer machines like they use to pres… (View Post)2 -
Re: Will a coin retone at all after conservation
Slabbing a conserved coin will considerably restrict the ability of the coin to retone naturally. One of the reasons for slabbing is protecting the coin from corrosion, and "toning" is just… (View Post)1 -
Re: Double Hole Denmark 1 Ore
The second hole has indeed been drilled post-mint; it is not a mint error. As to "why", you'd have to ask the person who did it. It does seem kind of pointless, as it's not a &quo… (View Post)1 -
Re: PCGS Restored Two Morgans then Graded them as Details (Cleaned)
I for one am comforted by this story. I'm sorry for the OP's situation, of course, but it is an excellent example to prove that the company isn't simply straight-grading everything tre… (View Post)3