PaulMaul ✭✭✭✭✭
Reactions
-
Re: PSA 8 (OF) - Has anyone seen this designation?
It means “out of focus”….but honestly I’ve seen a million cards with poorer focus than this one without that qualifier, so it’s evidently another very subjective call. (View Post)3 -
Re: 1979 Topps Eckersley - Does this look like a PSA 10?
I don’t know why you guys are so attached to this theory when there is no proof of it. Isn’t it enough to be upset with incorrect grading? (View Post)2 -
Re: Topps VS OPC baseball observations...
Truth is, if you crack out any 10 and resubmit you probably won’t get a 10 again. (View Post)3 -
Re: The Official 2024-2025 NBA Season Discussion Thread
From what I have heard the Knicks probably won’t be able to afford to keep Hartenstein which is a shame. Robinson is so injury prone, and other than rim protecting Hartenstein is a better player. (View Post)1 -
Re: Rough Cut PSA 10
I’m curious…to what extreme does this go? If the cutting blade was so dull that it tore a chunk of the card surface off, would that not affect the grade? (View Post)2